Jubilee coming
james armstrong
james36armstrong at hotmail.com
Wed Oct 12 08:52:45 BST 2011
JUBILEE
jca pap: Jub
FAR AWAY AND LONG AGO
A new old look at
land issues, ownership, rent, nationhood,
immigration, ethical
dealings and a concept strange to
British practice- reversion or redemption of LAND- the Jubilee
Sabbath Day every 7th
day
Sabbath year every seventh year
Jubilee year every 7x7 years ……all are related by a divine sanction
Leviticus CH 25 vvs 1-10 relates these three concepts
And introduces the idea of a Sabbath year in land usage.
a) this
mirrors the more familiar idea of a
Sabbath day in work
as set out in the
creation story in Genesis ch 1 v 31,
after making man on the sixth day .God rested justifying man also resting ..
Sabbath year and Sabbath
day have a double sided nature in common
The practical
and the holy. Both the 7th rest day and the 7th
rest year are practical- rest for workpeople after work and rest for the soil
as a crop rotational move.
The religious side is
interesting because it too is directly related to the ownership or proprietorship of land .
The premise for both the
day Sabbath and the year Sabbath are
Divine sanctions- God created the earth (all the land) and
RESTED ON TH 7th DAY
-
and the 7 yearly rest for the LAND ‘is holy to the Lord’ – a divine sanction for a rational or cultural practice – at 25 v 2
-
“ When you come unto the land I give
you then will you keep a Sabbath to the Lord.”
One cultural explanation is that here is agricultural advice
given to former pastoralists and sheep herders as they settle down to farm the
land – observe a fallow.
THE JUBILEE YEAR IS a year
related to the Sabbath year –
Every seven times seven years brings forward a Sabbath Year – the JUBILEE
There is here a cabbalistic or mystical numerical juggling
of numbers.
The jubilee year starts not on the first of January but on the 10th day of
the Seventh month-
And is further
sanctified by being this being the day of the national cultural and holy festival the annual ‘day of atonement’.
(still celebrated)
This is the background to the JUBILEE
Leviticus 25 vvs 11ff
This special year is premised again on LAND ..and the claim that LAND is HOLY
At CH 25 vs 55, the
ultimate divine proprietorship of land s explicit
“For unto me the children of Israel
are servants. “
and at v 23 “For the
Land is Mine….”
WHAT HAPPENS AT THE
JUBILEE
the Land shall not be sold for ever,
WHY ? for the Land is
mine and you are strangers and sojourners with me Lev 25.v55.
This introduces us to the
terms of the JUBILEE YEAR
WHAT HAPPENS ON JUBILEE YEAR?
“Proclaim liberty
throughout the land” the context
suggest liberty of slaves. (and as we will hear, reversion of land) Nowhere is there the idea of releasing criminal
prisoners .
but “to all
inhabitants it shall be a JUBILEE to you”
Each one is to return to his family property
Which implies a clan system (Is this relevant to us today?)
DO NOT SOW OR REAP
but live on wild food
(impracticable literally)
IF YOU SELL LAND TO A FELLOW COUNTRYMAN do not take advantage of him.
(This is a qualified
morality !)
YOU ARE TO BUY AND
SELL ON THE BASIS OF THENUMBER OF YEARS
what you are selling is really the number of crops before
the land reverts to the previous owner.
It is a leasehold system more of that later
FEAR GOD AND FOLLOW THE LAWS.. this will bring prosperity
Suggests an explanation for
the cyclical nature of farm prosperity. In bad years you must have sinned!
THE LAND MUST NOT BE SOLD PERMANENTLY
Why ? “Because the Land is mine and you are but aliens and my tenants!”
(the Divine sanction)
here is the
revolutionary doctrine-
Throughout the country
that you hold as a possession
You MUST provide for the
redemption of the LAND
Lev. Explains IF A COUNTRYMAN IS POOR AND SELLS HIS LAND
His nearest relative is to redeem the land (buy it back)
the poor man has the right to buy it back if he finds the
money later.
IF NOT REDEEMED the Land is alienated (ONLY) –
UNTIL THEYEAR OF the JUBILEE
“ It will be returned
(FREE) in the year of the Jubilee”
IF A COUNTRYMAN GETS POOR AND WORKS AS A SLAVE- free him at
Jubilee
IF A MAN SELLS A HOUSE WITH A WALLED GARDEN in a city
- HE CAN REDEEM IT WITHIN A YEAR.
After a year the sale is permanent and is not redeemable at
the jubilee
HOUSES IN VILLAGES on
the contrary, are in open country and can be (like land) redeemed.
IF A COUNTRYMAN IS POOR
help him as you would an alien
DO NOT TAKE INTEREST OF ANY KIND.
DO NOT MAKE A PROFIT ON FOOD YOU SELL
YOU MUST NOT LEND MONEY AT INTEREST
If a countryman is poor and sells himself
Treat him as a hired
worker and free him with his children
AT THE JUBILEE
Why?
Because I brought you
out of Egypt
and I am God
AND ISREALITES ARE MY SERVANTS they must not be sold as slaves
( conditional ethics
here , slavery of aliens condoned by implication)
and explicitly at ch25 v 44 where we read …
“Take your male and female slaves from the nations around
you”
A COUNTRYMAN CAN BUY HIMSELF BACK FROM AN ALIEN….
This implies aliens too can keep slaves)
BUT HAS THE RIGHT TO BE FREED AT THE TIME OF THE JUBILEE
THE VALUE OF THIS OLD
DOCTRINE FOR TODAY (It is doubtful if it was ever adhered to) .
Here is set out an
alternative system of landholding
Accept the aeteological explanation of the text
or the
alternative, Divine revelation
-
or both- a written account explaining present day
(then) Israeli practices
but giving an overarching acknowledgement to ethical and highly unethical practices,
There is an ethical ( flawed ethical ) code included as an integral part of
land law
Both Exodous and Leviticus posit ancient provenance as the justification of
their present practice.
-
If there is one lesson from the details of
JUBILEE in Leviticus it is the consideration
to treat all private exclusive ownership as conditional and temporary and subsidiary
-
– then to the Jewish God - now in a
hybrid monarchy and parliamentary
democracy (where the people hardly figure) to the sole landowner as the head of state
-
but if we reformed and effective ‘democracy
‘ where the people are sovereign- the people as a whole would have sole ownership of the land with individuals holding temporary and subsidiary rights
With an understanding that control of the land is more
important than possession or ownership.
Also bearing in mind that
The worst failing of the present system is it enables
exploitation of the landless by the monopoly land owners by means of making the landless pay in rents,
high house costs, and by direct taxes (e.g. CAP payments benefiting the
landowners) which they are able to do since 99 per cent of people own no bulk
land .
Also monopoly as at
present is a progressive disease and tightens over the years.
All this is premised on the National myth ,
or historical event, of the
Israelites being freed from slavery in Egypt
and being promised LAND (occupied by
other people)
(part of the promise was also partisan and shocking -
“and you shall have peace in the land and you shall chase
your enemies and they will fall before you by the sword “. Lev 26.v7
The ‘promised land’ credo
always carries with it the reverse side - ethnic cleansing - of the original
occupants.
So human ownership of
LAND in the Old Testament is not absolute but
always conditional
The Israelis only at best
are (explicitly) strangers and sojourners with me ( tenants?) for the land is mine “ (Lev
25v 23 )
Who is this who owns the land ?
The word in Hebrew –
Adonai - frequently translated as Lord , denotes ownership,
usually in the
context of a landowner and slave owner
and owner of servants.
.This is an
alternative view of land ownership in contrast to our present legal set up.
Why bother with ancient
cases from partisan Hebrew writings?
The Queen is the only
legal owner of land in UK
as I understand Cahill, all others even
freeholders having ‘title’ to land , only.
Here the Queen steps into the place of God- the royal claim
Fid Def on our coins- defender of
the faith- implies just that, and in England ,the Queen is the head? of the state
church- the Church of England. This is a
pale reflection of the Stewart claim to inheritance of the monarchy by divine right.
However the Queen is
also one of the largest private landowners in UK-
Read the Wealth of the Windsors by Andrew Morton, also Who Owns Britain
by Kevin Cahill.
The implication sows confusion. When royals acquire title by means of privately buying
estates particularly Balmoral and Sandrigham , the Queen’s inheritance from
Queen Victoria and King Edward respectively
has abrogated her claim to divinely inspired title to all the land of
UK,.
(If she owns all alnd
why buy it? ) Has she therefore
invalidated all inherited title? These
are based ultimately on the conquest of the land
of England
by Duke William- or at least of all land titles going back to Tudor times. Since so many current bulk landowners owe their title to lands confiscated from the
Church at the time of the Dissolution in 1536 .’37 etc ,
is it now unreliable to
attribute good title to any such past sales or grants of land from the
crown rendering present tiles to many vast estates invalid?
Our Western civilization , constitution, ethics, and
social norms (as well as religion), and capitalism (read RH Tawney, “Religion
and the rise of capitalism”) owe a huge
debt to judo- Christian origins.
The crudity of these
old writings, particularly the chauvinism, racial discrimination
Animal sacrifice, and ethnic cleansing are repugnant to many
beliefs.
Noticeable too is the
subordination of women in ancient Hebrew
society..
In addition for many
there is no longer the same need for an explanation of the origin of species
and attributing it to hands-on divine
intervention, nor to look for divine
inspiration for ethical standards.
Religious belief has perhaps declined , only to be replaced
by spiritualism and mysticism, or
perhaps by a more intellectual and less anthropomorphic sort of religion, and a less literal
interpretation of the bible. .
Atheists have to explain why religion and spiritual beliefs
are so widely shared as to be almost universal - if diverse - in different societies world-wide.
What some can find in Leviticus is an alternative to the present
UK
system of rights to land alternative to absolute ownership with more inclusive not exclusive control of Land. Also
there is a strong input of ethical
behavior (if limited to the in group of
fellow countrymen.).
Slavery too is repugnant to modern thinking.
The
different system of land use and control
set out in Leviticus is worthy of
consideration if it helps abolish what
is to–day a failing of the present system-
the divisive nature of monopoly
land ownership, and promises to end the abuse of this for a few powerful individuals and corporations which use this control to oppress those without such
exclusive access and which control and use
land to exploit the excluded group .
The present system
encourages massive monopoly
Landbanking by corporate house builders, distorts the provision, rents and pricing of houses in
the UK.
Agribusiness increases factory
farming, creates rural unemployment, and
enables landowners to secretly harvest
massive annual taxes in the name of ‘farming’.
Excessive
concentration on nationalism- which is the arrangement of society behind exclusive territorial frontiers, and land
hunger has caused wars on an unprecedented scale .
Socialisation (I prefer that term to ‘nationalization’) of land,
deserves a consideration and
Leviticus may have some lessons on how to achieve or not to achieve a better
system of land use and control.
Here endeth the lesson for to-day.
(that’s a joke)
JA October 2011
JCA papers: Jubilee.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/private/diggers350/attachments/20111012/be84f3a1/attachment.html>
More information about the Diggers350
mailing list