Luddites - Financial Crisis and Austerity: the Role of Technology
Ned Ludd
tony at cultureshop.org.uk
Fri Oct 4 13:10:48 BST 2013
Dear friends,
we having problems with our Yahoo email account and so are sending
you this update from a new address. If you need to reply, please
reply to the normal address:
<mailto:luddites200 at yahoo.co.uk>luddites200 at yahoo.co.uk. If you get
this update twice due to te technical problems, please forgive us.
Ned
1. Breaking the Frame 4; Financial Crisis and Austerity; the Role of Technology
2. Report on BTF3; Gender and the Politics of Technology
The Breaking the Frame series is progressing extremely well: the
third meeting was again very lively and well attended. The idea
behind the series is to show the commonality between different
technology politics issues, rather than just have a series of
meetings on disparate issues. So we want to encourage everyone to try
to come to as many of the meetings as possible, rather than just to
the one that you have a special interest in, or are campaigning on.
As usual, the next meeting will be preceded at 6pm by an open
discussion on some basic issues in the politics of technology, to
which all are welcome.
1. Breaking the Frame 4 Financial Crisis and Austerity: the Role of Technology
megamachinetoplow
The ongoing financial crisis has exposed the fragility of the banking
and finance system, and the 2008 crash would have been impossible
without the 'dark magic' of computer-generated derivatives. But while
we continue to debate banker's bonuses, automated High Frequency
Trading has taken over the stock market, creating new volatility as
algorithms complete trades in milliseconds. Back in the real world
of austerity created by the crisis, automation is contributing to
public sector job loss, as workers are replaced with machines. How
can we get technology to serve people not profit?
When: 7pm September 9th 2013
Where: Fairly Square Bar & Cafe, 51 Red Lion St London WC1R 4PF
Introductions from:
Dave Dewhurst, <http://occupylondon.org.uk/>Occupy London Economics
Working Group
Corporate Watch and Kaput, tbc
For more information and the full list of forthcoming events visit
the <http://breakingtheframe.org.uk/?page_id=12>Breaking the Frame
blog or contact luddites200 at yahoo.co.uk.
2. Report on BTF3; Gender and the Politics of Technology
The third Breaking the Frame meeting again generated a very lively debate.
Well-known author and campaigner, Cynthia Cockburn, introduced the
discussion, focusing on technology and work, and how it creates not
only social class but also gender roles. Typically women have been
excluded from jobs requiring a high degree of technical knowledge,
and are placed in the role of operators of machinery. Cynthia's
research showed that this pattern persisted during the introduction
of electronic machinery, with male engineers typically being
responsible for managing systems and hardware, even though women have
to some degree been able to get involved in designing software. As a
result, men still occupy the higher status and better-paid jobs in
nearly all industries. Cynthia's talk can be found
<http://breakingtheframe.org.uk/?p=81>here
David King of Human Genetics Alert talked about the inherent gender
politics of the technocratic society of the last 400 years and the
way in which that is played out in reproductive technologies. The
Scientific Revolution of the 17th Century marked a shift from a
medieval cosmology that saw the world as a living organism, and
nature as female, to the modern world-view which sees nature as
mechanical. The key philosophers and scientists of the Scientific
Revolution wrote of the need to dominate and control nature through
technology, and their language was full of gendered metaphors about
the need to pacify the unruly female. This attempt to repress and
control the female can also be seen in the contemporaneous witch persecutions.
In the 20th Century, technocracy began to get to grips with human
reproduction, and its first step was the eugenics movement. Again,
the fundamental idea was to control the randomness and mess involved
in the mixing of genes in sexual reproduction, in order to create a
better-planned and more efficient society. The eugenics movement
tended to target women rather than men, for example in the
sterilization of unwed mothers and the classic eugenic texts, such as
the study of the Jukes family, focused on pointing out how all the
descendants of a particular woman were criminals, prostitutes, and
supposedly of low intelligence. However, eugenics movement also had a
benign face for women; pioneers of birth control such as Marie Stopes
in Britain and Margaret Sanger in the US were committed eugenicists.
This double-edged nature of technocratic progress continued
throughout the 20th Century, for example, in the population control
movement, which was again closely connected to the eugenics movement.
Of course, when not being coercive, the availability of contraception
created genuine benefits to women in allowing them to control their
own fertility.
A series of technological interventions in reproduction, including
contraception, pre-natal testing, the general medicalisation and
hospitalisation of childbirth and IVF and other reproductive
technologies, continued throughout the 20th Century, with positive
and negative aspects for women. Reproductive technologies use strong
hormonal drugs with major side-effects for women, the long-term
health effects of which have been poorly studied. In the last 15
years, the demand for donor eggs for infertile women led to the
creation of a commercial egg trade in which Eastern European women
were subjected to extremely high doses of hormones in order to
maximise egg production, with some cases of major health problems.
Surrogacy has also created an international trade with poor Indian
women often being forced into the role of surrogates by their
families, while Western couples simply fly in and pick up the baby
that they commissioned. Finally, throughout much of Asia, pre-natal
testing and the abortion of female foetuses has led to a deficit of
over 100 million women. In the UK, there has recently been
controversy over a decision by the Crown Prosecution Service not to
prosecute two doctors who agreed to perform abortions on women who
stated that the reason for the abortion was that the child was a girl.
Connie Hunter of the Women's Environmental Network intended to speak
about GM technology and its impact on Third World women farmers, but
was unfortunately unable to attend, so her talk was read out by the
facilitator of the meeting, Gail Chester. Connie pointed out that GM
crops will affect men and women differently depending on the gendered
division of labour in different places. The research agenda of
biotechnology is dominated by white men in developed countries and
research is targeted towards industrial agriculture, not subsistence
farming. In many countries, women choose and preserve seed, but their
knowledge is not respected by the system that develops commercial
seed. The patenting of seeds and the use of hybrid seeds can lead to
reduction in genetic diversity and makes whole communities dependent
upon the external source of seeds. GM crops can increase the use of
pesticides and women can be more vulnerable to toxins at certain
times in their reproductive cycles. Overall, instead of seeing GM as
the solution to feeding the world, rural women tend to view GM as
part of the corporate food-production system that undermines their
food security. Connie's talk can be found at
<http://breakingtheframe.org.uk/?p=75>http://breakingtheframe.org.uk/?p=75
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/private/diggers350/attachments/20131004/99516cd8/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/x-ygp-stripped
Size: 211 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/private/diggers350/attachments/20131004/99516cd8/attachment.bin>
More information about the Diggers350
mailing list