At yacht parties in Cannes, councils have been selling our homes from under us

[tony at cultureshop.org.uk]

At yacht parties in Cannes, councils have been selling our homes from under us
Aditya Chakrabortty

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/oct/14/yacht-cannes-selling-homes-local-government-officials-mipim
Aditya Chakrabortty
690 comments
Property developers wining and dining town hall executives - it’s a jaunt so lavish as to be almost comic

Time to accept that public-private partnerships just don’t work
Illustration by Daniel Pudles
 Illustration: Daniel Pudles
Tuesday 14 October 2014 06.00 BST

Starting this Wednesday, 4,000 men (and, yes, they’ll mainly be men) will gather in a giant hall in London. Among them will be major property developers, billionaire investors and officials of your local council or one nearby. And what they’ll discuss will be the sale of public real estate, prime land already owned by you and me, to the private sector. The marketing people brand this a property trade show, but let’s drop the euphemisms and call it the sales fair to flog off Britain.

Advertisement

For the past 25 years, this conference – Mipim for short – has been held in Cannes. It’s a jaunt so lavish as to be almost comic – where big money developers invite town hall executives for secret discussions aboard private yachts, and whose regulars boast that they get through more champagne than all the liggers at the film festival.

Suitably oiled-up, local officials open talks with multinational developers to sell council housing estates and other sites. All this networking is so lucrative for the builders that they even fly over council staff. Last year, Australia’s Lend Lease paid for Southwark’s boss, Peter John, to attend Cannes. This is the same Lend Lease to which Southwark sold the giant Heygate estate at a knockdown price: 1,100 council flats in inner London to be demolished and replaced with 2,500 units, of which only 79 will be for “social rent”.

Advertisement

Events such as Mipim raise the flag on the land grab that eventually leads to thousands of people being kicked out of their homes – and in many cases out of London. It is a forum that relies on invitation-only lunches, secret talks and the public being kept well away. In a shamefully undemocratic development system, this is one of the most untransparent forums of the lot.

You might think that seven years after the collapse of an economic system built on property speculation and amid a historic housing crisis, Mipim would have no place in the UK. You’d be wrong. When it opens this week it will be to a welcome address from that loveable friend of big money, Boris Johnson. Even with 344,000 households in London awaiting a council home, the mayor is cheering on their flogging off and replacement with unaffordable luxury flats. Joining him will be Conservative ministers, senior civil servants and council delegations from Glasgow through Leeds and Liverpool and down to Croydon.

Many of these councils are coming because they have no other means of raising serious cash: three decades after Thatcher’s rate caps, and four years into the most painful cuts faced by local government, they are flat broke. Some council leaders will admit as much privately. But in all cases, the strong scent of neediness comes off their planned Mipim session titles (“Croydon: the economic powerhouse of the south-east”) – and forces them into the kind of rotten deals that jeopardise the livelihoods of their residents.

On Sunday afternoon, a group of about 40 Londoners convened in a Pimlico community centre. A greater contrast with the hangars of Mipim can hardly be imagined: no lavish buffet, just a kettle and some instant coffee; no PowerPoint slides but a dungareed bloke scribbling on a flipchart. But the people here knew about the property fest: they live on the council estates about to be demolished to make way for private developers. They reeled off where they were from: Chelsea, Elephant and Castle, Haringey, Barnet. Some had already been handed their court orders and were unsure if they’d even be in London next month. One woman, who had bought her Southwark council flat as Thatcher and Blair encouraged her to, had been offered a risible sum to get out. As the group planned meetings and demonstrations before Christmas, she kept repeating: “I might be homeless by then.” The first couple of times, she even managed to smile.

These people live in public housing built with public money on public land. And soon, their homes will be someone else’s speculative asset. The British Property Federation (BPF) published a report last year which showed that of London’s newly built homes, only 39% were bought to live in. The vast majority – 61% – were taken by investors. After the meeting broke up, a resident of Churchill Gardens in Pimlico walked me around her estate and pointed out the old people’s home and lovely modernist low-rise block that was earmarked for the wrecking ball. It faced out on to the Thames; on the other side was Battersea power station, being turned by Malaysian investors into luxury flats. In this part of London, that same BPF report found, 49% of new-build homes were bought by overseas investors.

Against that backdrop even the smallest victory looks historic. Up on the northwestern perimeter of London, in West Hendon, other council residents are fighting the borough of Barnet over the redevelopment of their estate on terms that suit the developer, Barratt Developments, not locals. Just under 700 homes are to be smashed up to make way for 2,000 new units. Just under 1,500 will be sold privately: the rest will be “affordable”, which in the doublespeak of housing means unaffordable.

The council cannot say how many social-rental homes will be provided, but it is clear that whatever provision there is will be grudging. With a quick Google you’ll find a video of the chair of Barnet’s housing committee, Tom Davey, claiming that his council is providing affordable housing because people are buying them. An objector points out that only the wealthy can afford them and the young Conservative thumps the desk and says: “Those are the people we want.”

Whatever the propaganda, when I turn up at West Hendon, I meet a telecoms worker and a full-time carer. I also meet a woman in her 60s who hasn’t had a good night’s sleep in years, and a man facing homelessness and suffering depression.

About a third of the estate’s residents have already been bounced from regeneration to regeneration. They have no idea where they’ll go when they’re moved out. Others are leaseholders who can’t afford to buy anywhere in London on the £165,000 offered by the council. The majority of the tenants will be moved to what was formerly a car park, surrounded by busy roads.

“A giant traffic island” is how it is described by Jasmin Parsons, who’s lived on the estate for over 30 years. From there, she and her neighbours can look at their old homes, which are now off-limits to them and their children. Their faces won’t fit the area, you see, and their bank balances certainly don’t go far enough. They’ll be barely tolerated trespassers on yet another private development.

Maybe there’s a metaphor in there for all of us.

Local government  UK news  Housing  Communities
Share via Email
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on Google+
More on this story

Anger at Cannes property fair where councils rub shoulders with oligarchs
14 Mar 2014 8 commentsAnger at Cannes property fair where councils rub shoulders with oligarchs
opinion

The British vote to recognise Palestine won’t change a complex reality
Azriel Bermant
The British vote to recognise Palestine won’t change a complex reality

Brian Cox's Human Universe presents a fatally flawed view of evolution
Brian Cox's Human Universe presents a fatally flawed view of evolution
Cameron and the morris dancers: a sign of our nationalistic mood
Lola Okolosie
Cameron and the morris dancers: a sign of our nationalistic mood
Thank you wedding industry for sapping the joy out of getting married
Daisy Buchanan
Thank you wedding industry for sapping the joy out of getting married
Cite and sound: the pleasures and pitfalls of quoting people
Tom Calverley
Cite and sound: the pleasures and pitfalls of quoting people
Loading comments… Trouble loading?
Comments
Open for comments. Sign in or create your Guardian account to join the discussion.
View unthreaded
View   first
Loading comments…

ID8774521
4m ago
 
0
1
Guardian Pick
"Starting this Wednesday, 4,000 men (and, yes, they’ll mainly be men)"

What an important article... but what a great way to (edit) hate on a people after just one sentence by being a bigot.

So 'mainly' men, but not all men then, meaning women are capable of being egregious with property and money too..? Meaning this isn't really about gender at all, but we, being men too, should feel guilty that it's 'mainly men' making these decisions and we share that gender in common with them?

"...eventually leads to thousands of people being kicked out of their homes..." so potentially homeless eh? Why doesn't he mention that the homeless community is made up of 'mainly men' too, or are we only allowed to talk about 'men' if it's in a derogatory fashion?

Sod that. I'd hate them even if it was 'mainly giraffes' making the decision so the casual, unnoticed sexism so prevalent in our media strikes again eh?

Reply Report

Snapshackle
5m ago
 
0
1
Guardian Pick
Aditya, how about naming and shaming the Council's supping at the vultures' table?

Reply Report Close report comment form 
Reason (optional)

Email (optional)
Report View more comments
Popular in Comment is free
Popular in The Guardian
1 Why is there so much hostility to immigrants in the UK? | Richard Seymour
2 At yacht parties in Cannes, councils have been selling our homes from under us | Aditya Chakrabortty
3 Thank you wedding industry for sapping the joy out of getting married | Daisy Buchanan
4 Amal Alamuddin took George Clooney's name? Oh please – put your torches and pitchforks away | Eleanor Robertson
5 Cameron and the morris dancers: a sign of our nationalistic mood | Lola Okolosie
6 Just how 'gay' is anal play, really? | Zach Stafford
7 My baby will be mixed race. So why did I automatically think of him as 'black'? | Victoria Bond
8 Do ghosts exist? Four theories on our fascination with apparitions | The panel
9 Should the US have chosen Hillary Clinton instead of Barack Obama? | Timothy Garton Ash
10 Steve Bell on the 2015 general election debates – cartoon
More stories from around the web
Promoted content by Outbrain
Interest Rates: What Mortgage Holders Need to Know
Money Advice Service
4 Key Tips to Beat the Interest Rate Rise
Money Advice Service
Fruit For The Office
The Times
Yo! Sushi Founder Simon Woodroffe Ads His Signature Touch to 'Tots Crops'
The Times
Why Millenials Are Invading the Suburbs
OZY
The People Living In London’s Most Expensive Areas Aren’t Even British
OZY
Recommended by
guardian masterclasses
courses from the guardian
View all Masterclasses

Jay Rayner: How to write a column. And keep writing it
14 October 2014
The Guardian, London | £49.00

Book now

How to launch a distillery
15 October 2014
Aveqia London, London | £119.00

Book now
back to top
home
UK
world
sport
football
culture
economy
life
fashion
environment
tech
money
travel
all
comment	
›	local government
membership
jobs
soulmates
masterclasses
all topics
all contributors
info and resources
contact us
securedrop
feedback
complaints & corrections
terms & conditions
privacy policy
cookie policy
desktop site
© 2014 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved.