The homeless should be helped, not criminalised
Tony Gosling
tony at cultureshop.org.uk
Sun Jan 21 22:33:41 GMT 2018
The homeless should be helped, not criminalised
https://www.varsity.co.uk/comment/14335
http://tlio.org.uk/varsity-the-homeless-should-be-helped-not-criminalised/
In response to new plans to fine people for
sleeping rough, Charlotte Lillywhite condemns
councils callous treatment of the homeless
[]
Stoke-on-Trent council plans to reduce their
funding of homelessness services by £1mGARRY KNIGHT, FLICKR
by <https://www.varsity.co.uk/profile/charlottelillywhite>Charlotte Lillywhite
Sunday January 7 2018, 10:17pm
<https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwi-2KbJgK3YAhVjOMAKHUvVDWsQjRwIBw&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.flickr.com%2Fphotos%2Fgarryknight%2F12459375745&psig=AOvVaw11KPuGCOj4YX3KkqoeUxdR&ust=1514560625675194>
The proposal issued by Stoke-on-Trent City
Council to fine homeless people for sleeping in
tents, for persistent or aggressive begging, and
for sleeping in public toilets, is appalling.
Although the proposal concerning the use of tents
has now been scrapped following a public
petition, the council is still considering
whether to impose fines for the other activities.
An on-the-spot penalty of £100 may be issued,
followed by prosecution and a bill of up to £1000
if the initial penalty is left unpaid. This
doesnt mean that the fine for sleeping in tents
is any less relevant, however: the councils
desire to put it in place, and the support that
the proposal attracted, is telling in itself.
Economic motives lurk beneath the surface of
these proposed fines. The proposals were
primarily supported by businesses in
Stoke-on-Trent. This indicates that people are
more concerned about the way that the city
appears to tourists and consumers, than they are
about those who have found themselves in
desperately vulnerable situations. The charity
Shelter recorded that 43 people in Stoke-on-Trent
were without a home this year. It also noted a
22% increase in homelessness in the West Midlands in the last twelve months.
How do councils expect the homeless to pay these fines?
The prioritisation of appearance over reality is
also revealed in the impracticality of these
policies how does the council expect homeless
people to pay the fines which are to be
needlessly imposed upon them? This inefficacy
forces us to interrogate the councils motives.
Are the proposals designed to send out an
intolerant message to the citys homeless?
A sinister behavioural system begins to emerge
from behind the legitimate façade of the
councils policies: an effort is being made to
criminalise the homeless. By trying to make
sleeping in a tent an offence, and by attempting
to criminalise aggressive and persistent
begging terms which can be subjectively defined
and thus manipulated councillors legitimise the
stigmas which propelled them to punish
rough-sleepers in the first place.They exploit
social fears by forging an imaginative link
between homelessness and crime. This validates
their treatment of the homeless as criminals,
excusing their perpetuation of prejudice by
deflecting any criticism onto the idea of law and
order. Through this, PSPOs (Pubic Space
Protection Orders, which allow councils to
criminalise activities within certain areas)
become a series of legal loopholes, enabling
unjustified punishments to be proposed.
This exploitation is widespread: 36 local
councils in England and Wales are working on
similar policies involving PSPOs, including
Newport City Council, which is trying to place a
blanket ban on rough sleeping and begging. On a
larger scale, the government is distorting the
reality of homelessness in our society. At PMQs
on 13th December, Theresa May brazenly lied about
the situation, claiming that statutory
homelessness peaked under the Labour government
and is down by over 50% since then. This implies
that the Conservatives are responsible for
reducing the figures. The truth, however, is
that, while statutory homelessness did peak under
Labour, this was a result of Conservative control
from 1979 to 1996. Labour went on to reduce the
number of rough sleepers to its lowest level
since 1998. Homelessness only began to rise again
once the Conservatives returned to power in 2010:
the DCLG reports that the number of households in
temporary accommodation has increased by 65% since December of that same year.
This rise is irrefutably linked to Conservative
policy. Since coming into office, the government
has slashed benefits, cut council funding and
reduced the availability of affordable housing.
This pushes people into desperate situations and
has left a considerable number of them homeless.
For example, the DCLG has linked 28% of cases
involving those who have become homeless since
2010 to Assured Shorthold Tenancies. Those who
are victimised by government policy are then
punished by the same authorities. This is
exemplified by the situation in Stoke-on-Trent,
where the recent proposals run alongside a plan
to reduce support for homelessness services by £1m, due to budget cuts.
This forces people back into the vulnerable
situations in which they started. Only now there
is a framework which legitimises their callous
treatment. To truly change the situation, the
prejudice which encourages the formation of these
policies and grants them legitimacy must be
dismantled: systemic action is required to change
the causes of the issue rather than the effects.
We need transparency to ensure reality is no
longer distorted and to avoid the manipulation of
the public at the hands of authority
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/private/diggers350/attachments/20180121/29a7fa50/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/x-ygp-stripped
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/private/diggers350/attachments/20180121/29a7fa50/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
From South America, where payment must be made with subtlety, the
Bormann organization has made a substantial contribution. It has
drawn many of the brightest Jewish businessmen into a participatory
role in the development of many of its corporations, and many of
these Jews share their prosperity most generously with Israel. If
their proposals are sound, they are even provided with a specially
dispensed venture capital fund. I spoke with one Jewish businessmen
in Hartford, Connecticut. He had arrived there quite unknown several
years before our conversation, but with Bormann money as his
leverage. Today he is more than a millionaire, a quiet leader in the
community with a certain share of his profits earmarked as always for
his venture capital benefactors. This has taken place in many other
instances across America and demonstrates how Bormann's people
operate in the contemporary commercial world, in contrast to the
fanciful nonsense with which Nazis are described in so much "literature."
So much emphasis is placed on select Jewish participation in Bormann
companies that when Adolf Eichmann was seized and taken to Tel Aviv
to stand trial, it produced a shock wave in the Jewish and German
communities of Buenos Aires. Jewish leaders informed the Israeli
authorities in no uncertain terms that this must never happen again
because a repetition would permanently rupture relations with the
Germans of Latin America, as well as with the Bormann organization,
and cut off the flow of Jewish money to Israel. It never happened
again, and the pursuit of Bormann quieted down at the request of
these Jewish leaders. He is residing in an Argentinian safe haven,
protected by the most efficient German infrastructure in history as
well as by all those whose prosperity depends on his well-being.
<http://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fspitfirelist.com%2Fbooks%2Fmartin-bormann-nazi-in-exile%2F&h=eAQErj17O>http<http://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fspitfirelist.com%2Fbooks%2Fmartin-bormann-nazi-in-exile%2F&h=eAQErj17O>://spitfirelist.com/books/martin-bormann-nazi-in-exile/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/private/diggers350/attachments/20180121/29a7fa50/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Diggers350
mailing list