Organic farmer pens a provocative discussion document - Zero Carbon, 5G Denial & Green-Fascism

Tony Gosling tony at
Mon Oct 28 01:47:20 GMT 2019

Prince Charles 'lobbied for climate policy change 
without disclosing offshore financial interest'
Prince's actions amount to ‘serious conflict of 
interest’, says former chairman of the Committee on Standards in Public Life

Zero Carbon, 5G Denial And Green-fascism
October 22, 2019

Zero Carbon, 5G Denial and Green-Fascism

Julian Rose, Contributor - Waking Times

Why is it that the two words ‘Zero Carbon’ send a 
cool shiver down my spine? Is it the ‘zero’ or is 
it the ‘carbon’? Or is it particularly the combination of the two?

I wasn’t sure, until I looked-up ‘zero carbon’ 
within a scientific context addressing greenhouse 
gasses, and the answer that came back was this 
“If there were no greenhouse gasses the average 
temperature on Earth would be about -18 degrees 
celsius”.  Now I know why the cool shiver passed down my spine.

The high-profile use of this zero carbon goal, 
particularly via Green New Deal proponents upping 
the pressure on governments to follow-through 
their commitments to the Paris climate change 
treaty, carries with it the overtones of a global 
crusade. And the missionary zeal behind global 
crusades is often drummed-up by people and 
institutions guided by dogma rather than by 
conscious and humanitarian instincts for a better world.

An exploration of the roots of the ambition to 
achieve ‘zero carbon’ reveals a direct link to 
‘climate action’/’climate emergency’ measures 
promoted via Extinction Rebellion, advocates of a 
Green New Deal and the ‘sustainable development’ 
edicts of the United Nation’s Agenda 21 – now renamed  Agenda 2030.

All of these ‘stop global warming’ 
institutions/movements are heavily backed by 
money derived from sources that have no record of 
following a transparently ‘green’ commitment 
within their own ethos or business practices.

Now this immediately raises the question: if the 
backers are not ethically in line with the 
supposed aims of those they are funding  – could 
those that they are funding be influenced to 
adapt to the values of their backers? Might they 
be drawn into something quite contrary to the 
original ideal they set out to achieve?

Well, quite obviously the answer is yes, they 
could. And a quick review of the fate of such 
organisations as Greenpeace and Friends of the 
Earth shows that this is exactly what happened.

High ambitions of the sort embraced by 
Greenpeace, for example, led to it becoming 
embroiled in ‘the art of compromise’ for the sake 
of rapid growth and influence.

Very soon genuine green credentials become 
tainted by the influence of the corporate and/or 
political backers, whose funds come with the 
proviso to adhere to certain criteria and 
conditions in order for further funding to be 
guaranteed. It’s a trap a large number of 
ambitious NGO’s have fallen  into and never recovered from.

The truth is that leading parties in green NGO 
organisations focused on a prize which conformed 
to the standard definition of neo-liberal 
globalisation ‘success’, rather than holding true 
to the founding principles of the organisations they were steering.

The green movement that jumped onto the 
band-wagon called ‘stop global warming’ has, 
however, got an even bigger problem to deal with, 
one which is far more devious than the familiar 
‘art of compromise’ that has undone so many once well-intentioned movements.

This is the fact that ‘the problem’ it is 
addressing is an invention – not a reality. An 
invention pushed into prominence by the United 
Nation’s body called the Intergovernmental Panel 
on Climate Change. A body with direct links to 
the most powerful grouping of corporate 
institutions on the planet with the addition of a 
coterie of multi millionaires determined to set 
the planet’s top-down ‘green’ agenda for the indefinite future.

An agenda that has little or nothing to do with 
the environment – and everything to do with the 
survival of the neo-liberal ‘big’ global economy, 
as admitted by Dr. Otmar Edenhofer, head of 
Working Group 3 of the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

The actual causes of climactic change – and yes, 
it is happening – are to be found in a composite 
of man-made and natural events, ranging from 
HAARP’s gross interference via heating-up the 
ionosphere, atmospheric aerosol geoengineering 
(chemtrails), the residues of perpetual war, 
natural solar activity, the Pole shift, a 
weakening magnetosphere, intense electro smog and ozone depletion.

CO2 making only a tiny contribution.

Zero Carbon and the Extinction Event
The Centre for Alternative Technology (CAT) is an 
NGO  based in West Wales. It started-out in the 
early 1970’s as a truly innovative ‘make 
something out of nothing’ alternative energy and 
ecological life style community. A small group of 
entrepreneurs settled an old slate quarry at 
Machynlleth on the edge of Snowdonia, and built 
around themselves a community devoted to 
self-sufficiency, especially in renewable energy, 
where home-made wind turbines and water wheels, 
mostly constructed from scrap metal, powered 
their makeshift homes and artisan enterprises. 
CAT was an inspiration for many early ecological 
enthusiasts, many of whom (including myself) had 
read EF Schumacher’s iconic book ‘Small Is 
Beautiful’ and wanted to put into practice the 
human scale wisdom expressed in its pages.

The CAT community increased throughout the 1980’s 
and 1990’s and more eco-friendly innovations were 
put in place that enabled the public to get their 
hands onto green solutions to everyday needs. 
Soon people came from all over the world to learn 
about renewable energy and the art of human scale 
ecologically sustainable living.

It wasn’t until around 2000 that most of the 
original pioneers retired from active involvement 
in CAT’s development and a new breed of 
entrepreneur took their place. With a focus ever 
more geared to education, large sums of money 
were raised to build a state of the art rammed 
earth eco-friendly education centre in which 
officially recognised state supported training 
courses were put in place that enabled budding 
practitioners to learn the skills necessary for a 
general ‘greening ‘ of the wider environment.

As the global warming/climate change concept rose 
up the political agenda, so CAT became more and 
more absorbed by the edicts of the CO2 obsessed 
IPCC. Seeing itself as a beacon of pragmatic 
light in a sea of theoretical dogma, CAT’s new 
leadership sought to take the helm, declaring 
that the various suggested time frames for 
reduction in warming to be achieved by 
‘decarbonising’ the atmosphere, were all too long 
and too unambitious. There was an emergency, they 
declared, and (initially within the context of 
the UK) only a ‘zero carbon by 2030’ end game could save the day.

This message was presented to the public, to 
government officials and to industry, with 
scientific documentation to back it up. Suddenly 
CAT was the centre of a hugely controversial 
arena, pitching its Zero Carbon message in 
amongst the list of demands forming the basis of 
various international climate treaties of which 
the Paris accord is the most recent.

But how many stopped to ask the question: what exactly is ‘Zero Carbon’?

Do CAT and the other institutions holding high 
this flag want us to take it literally? Is it 
simply a strategic way of getting the climate 
change agenda speeded up? What actually is going on here?

Upon closer examination the entire package is 
riddled with holes. A kind of madness is built 
into the entire process, right from the original 
thesis that one variable – ‘CO2’ – a clear and 
odorless gas that constitutes just 0.0391% of the 
composition of the atmosphere, could, on its own, 
be responsible for dangerously warming the entire 
planet. This, even when this proportion may be 
rising due to the burning of fossil fuels.

Then the notion that we should all buckle down to 
bring this single element ‘carbon dioxide’ down 
to an even smaller percentage of global 
atmospheric gasses, by using carbon taxes and 
‘cap and trade’ regulations to force less 
industrialised countries of the world to slow 
their fossil fuel dependent economies and hobble 
their infrastructural development. Isn’t this 
simply the old colonial rule dressed in new 
clothes?  And these two issues are, of course, 
just the tip of the iceberg. The real story 
behind the push to promote ‘stop global 
warming’/’climate change’ involves the fostering 
of a scam whose scale and deviousness has surely 
set a new precedent in the art of deception.

Those, like me, who deeply believe in a 
progressive transformation of polluting fossil 
fuels into decentralised human scale renewable 
energy solutions, are being dramatically conned; 
even if CAT and other environmental NGO publications suggest otherwise.

Zero Carbon is the official call we are all being 
told to get behind, and it is the one taken up, 
directly or indirectly, by Extinction Rebellion, 
the Greta Thunberg school of youth 
indoctrination, the proponents of Green New Deal 
and the telecoms pushing forward a blanket 5G network.

Smelling big money, politicians are happy to go 
along with it too. Especially since Mark Carney, 
director of the Bank of England, announced that 
any businesses that do not conform to the zero 
carbon ‘green’ criteria will be blocked from 
access to new loans, while those that do can 
expect high financial rewards. Yes, all the big 
multinational/transnational corporations are 
being invited to the table and are running to get the best seats. It’s a heist.

A heist, led by ‘the green movement’ itself. What 
an irony! The supposedly anti neo-liberal 
globalist movement that was supposed to point the 
way to a decentralised, localised and human scale 
form of people power, taking sound ecological 
practices as the foundation for a world that 
would finally shift ‘the god of money’ off its 
throne to be replaced by the cultivation of 
respect for the laws of nature and a human scale 
economy operating ‘as if people mattered’.

When one takes a serious look at the scale of our 
current deviation from the path of truth, it 
swims before one’s eyes like a virtual reality 
dream (nightmare). The zero carbon world we are 
being exalted to adapt to, when viewed through 
this virtual google 3D head set, reveals scenes 
of a fenced-off brave new world of ‘rewilded’ 
landscapes on the one hand – and sterile 5G 
driven ‘smart cities’ on the other. All of it 
overseen by Amazon/Google ‘Cloud’ powered smart 
grids monitoring and controlling an ever more 
dystopian robotic world, increasingly resembling a totalitarian prison camp.

Ray Kurzwell would surely feel quite at home with 
the ushering-in of such artificial intelligence 
led systems finally achieving their place as the 
‘new brain’; having successfully usurped the human one.

Zero Carbon suggests to me that the cyborg 5G 
smart city is the Agenda 2030 ‘sustainable 
development’ carbon free omega point towards 
which we are all being ushered at brake-neck 
speed. With Caroline Lucas, Greta Thunberg, Gail 
Bradbrook, Yanis Verufakis and others leading 
‘the rebellion’ while holding high the flag of a Green-Fascist New World Order.

Eco-fascism has arrived on our doorstep and its 
appeal has become almost irresistible to those 
who combine a hyped-up fear of ‘the end of the 
world’ with belief in the rhetoric of bought-out 
climatologists, ambitious fake green con men (and 
women) and the political figurehead puppets of the deep state.

Zero carbon has taken the lead as ‘the solution’ 
to an anthropogenic global warming invention 
whose alarmist climate rhetoric was cunningly 
dreamed-up by the Club of Rome some thirty-five 
years ago, as the perfect means of controlling 
the people as well as the essential political 
agenda of planetary life, both economic and 
social. By cleverly giving carbon the lead role 
in an extinction narrative – in which it is caste 
as the chief villain – the perpetrators of the 
myth (United Nations plc) have grabbed the 
headlines –  insisting that this harmless, 
essential component of nature (CO2) is the 
all-time baddie that must now be reduced to zero 
in order to save the planet. The Putin of the biosphere.

The sheer audacity of this lie is breathtaking. 
Think about it.. reduce nature’s natural capital, 
carbon dioxide, to zero and what do you have?  An 
extinction event. The very ‘event’ that 
Extinction Rebellion is, on behalf of the United 
Nation’s Agenda 2030, blocking the streets of 
London, New York, Berlin et al. to demand action 
against. Thereby supporting a bunch of crooks, 
well versed in the art of deception, to enforce 
their master plan for absolute control combined 
with a significant reduction in the world 
population. “Carbon must be eliminated – 
therefore get rid of non carbon neutral humans.”

The unknowing would never associate fascism with 
environmentalism, would they. They would never 
guess that a fake green agenda could be the 
Trojan horse for the final take-over. Yet the 
fascist take-over that failed under Hitler and 
Mussolini, has crept steadily and stealthily 
forward under the dictatorship of the giant 
banking fiefdoms of the past half century – and 
it is precisely these institutions that are now 
falling in line to back a Green New Deal.

Green is the colour chosen for the final great 
deception and that which trees and plants convert 
into oxygen has been cast as the ‘demiurge’ which 
heroic styled NGO’s are riding out to do battle 
with. A battle to the death, no less.

We will not all be fooled all the time, even if a 
majority maintain an eyes wide shut disposition 
to the roll-out of such a toxic agenda. The 
wake-up is gathering momentum at an ever 
accelerating rate. An instinctual resistance to 
the 5G microwave crowd control weapon, coupled 
with a plethora of reports on its egregious 
health affects, is acting as a powerful vector to 
unite people across the globe, causing all of us 
to recognise that this is not just about one 
exceptionally cruel form of eco-genocide, but the 
pinnacling of an underlying fear – by humanity’s 
oppressors – of that which stands behind love, 
beauty, compassion and joy. Fear that takes the 
form of an aggressive suppression of these primary life instincts.

As the eminent social psychiatrist Dr Erich Fromm 
stated, it is The Fear of Freedom that we are 
witnessing in the diabolic attempts to shut-down 
the energetic evolution of the universal life force itself.

The tables are turning. The greater the downward 
pressure to conform to a dead-end, slavish and 
robotic existence, the greater the innate inner 
power of opposition rises up in resistance – in 
those who let it. A resistance sparked by outrage 
– and a defiant determination to act in defence of Life.

Onward, onward, dear friends, in the midst of the 
darkness more and more light is shining through!

About the Author
Julian Rose is an international activist, writer, 
organic farming pioneer and actor.  In 1987 and 
1998, he led a campaign that saved unpasteurised 
milk from being banned in the UK; and, with 
Jadwiga Lopata, a ‘Say No to GMO’ campaign in 
Poland which led to a national ban of GM seeds 
and plants in that country in 2006. Julian is 
currently campaigning to ‘Stop 5G’ WiFi. He is 
the author of two acclaimed titles: Changing 
Course for Life and In Defence of Life. His 
latest book Overcoming the Robotic Mind is now 
available from Amazon and Dixi Books. Julian is a 
long time exponent of yoga/meditation. See his 
web site for more information
NB please do reply with remove as the subject or 
first line if you do not wish to recieve further emails - thanks

'From South America, where payment must be made 
with subtlety, the Bormann organization has made 
a substantial contribution. It has drawn many of 
the brightest Jewish businessmen into a 
participatory role in the development of many of 
its corporations, and many of these Jews share 
their prosperity most generously with Israel. If 
their proposals are sound, they are even provided 
with a specially dispensed venture capital fund. 
I spoke with one Jewish businessmen in Hartford, 
Connecticut. He had arrived there quite unknown 
several years before our conversation, but with 
Bormann money as his leverage. Today he is more 
than a millionaire, a quiet leader in the 
community with a certain share of his profits 
earmarked as always for his venture capital 
benefactors. This has taken place in many other 
instances across America and demonstrates how 
Bormann’s people operate in the contemporary 
commercial world, in contrast to the fanciful 
nonsense with which Nazis are described in so much “literature.”

So much emphasis is placed on select Jewish 
participation in Bormann companies that when 
Adolf Eichmann was seized and taken to Tel Aviv 
to stand trial, it produced a shock wave in the 
Jewish and German communities of Buenos Aires. 
Jewish leaders informed the Israeli authorities 
in no uncertain terms that this must never happen 
again because a repetition would permanently 
rupture relations with the Germans of Latin 
America, as well as with the Bormann 
organization, and cut off the flow of Jewish 
money to Israel. It never happened again, and the 
pursuit of Bormann quieted down at the request of 
these Jewish leaders. He is residing in an 
Argentinian safe haven, protected by the most 
efficient German infrastructure in history as 
well as by all those whose prosperity depends on his well-being.'

You can donate to support Tony's work here

TG mobile +44 7786 952037  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the Diggers350 mailing list