[Diggers350] TLIO Founder George Monbiot Destroyed Top UK Anti-Nuclear Scientist Then Refused Public Debate

[Tony Gosling]

Can nuclear power ever be 'green', 'safe' or separated from the 
military's nuclear weapons obsession?



<https://www.reuters.com/markets/commodities/finland-activates-its-new-olkiluoto-3-nuclear-reactor-2021-12-21/>On 
the day the first European Pressurised Reactor (EPR) goes critical, 
or is switched on, in Finland




The same 
design<https://en.mercopress.com/2021/08/01/china-shuts-down-nuclear-power-reactor-for-safety-reasons> 
in China was on for a year then found unsafe, had to be switched off

Courtesy of the <http://www.llrc.org>UK Low Level Radiation Campaign 
- George's articles are linked from this page

https://tlio.org.uk/tlio-founder-george-monbiot-destroys-top-uk-anti-nuclear-scientist-using-his-guardian-column-then-refuses-public-debate/

Can nuclear power ever be 'green', 'safe' or seperated from the 
banksters' nuclear weapons obsession? 
https://tlio.org.uk/tlio-founder-george-monbiot-destroys-top-uk-anti-nuclear-scientist-using-his-guardian-column-then-refuses-public-debate/
On the day the first European Pressurised Reacto (EPR) goes critical, 
or is switched on, in Finland 
https://www.reuters.com/markets/commodities/finland-activates-its-new-olkiluoto-3-nuclear-reactor-2021-12-21/
The same design in China was on for a year then found unsafe, had to 
be switched off - 
https://en.mercopress.com/2021/08/01/china-shuts-down-nuclear-power-reactor-for-safety-reasons 

Courtesy of the UK Low Level Radiation Campaign - George's articles 
are linked from this page

George Monbiot, The Guardian, and Nuclearist articles of faith
(page first posted 27th July 2011; updated in February 2017)
http://www.llrc.org/pronuke/monbiot/monbiot.html

In May 2011 George Monbiot toured the UK "taking on all comers". The 
Guardian promoted these Left Hook events in the language of a boxing 
impressario, and puffed Monbiot as "the Guardian's unbeaten 
intellectual heavyweight champion of free speech, one of the UK's 
foremost thinkers and environmentalists, and polemicist supreme".

[]
  Shortly afterwards LLRC received a sound recording of one of the 
lectures. Recorded by an independent film-maker, it had taken place 
in Liverpool on May 10th 2011. George spoke about how the Fukushima 
disaster has converted him to Nuclearism, the dogma that new nuclear 
power stations can help to deliver us from Global Warming.

Earlier, he had argued on 
<https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/mar/21/pro-nuclear-japan-fukushima>a 
Guardian<https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/mar/21/pro-nuclear-japan-fukushima> 
blog that releases of radioactivity, even from disasters like 
Chernobyl and Fukushima, have no observable impact on health.
A member of the audience asked him how radioactive discharges from 
Sellafield had affected wildlife in the Irish Sea. He answered with a 
gratuitous and explicit attack on Professor Chris Busby although 
Busby's two decades of research into the health effects of 
radioactive pollution have been exclusively concerned with people, 
not wildlife.

[]

George Monbiot

----------
[]

Professor Busby

----------
After briefly dismissing the idea that Sellafield could have affected 
sea-life, Monbiot said:
"Now one of my greatest sources of concern and disenchantment I 
suppose is that one um er er self-styled nuclear researcher in 
particular, a man called Chris Busby who lives very close to where I 
do, who has been writing all that stuff about the Irish Sea and about 
leukaemia clusters and the rest of it for many years um , looking 
into his work and looking into what scientists say about his work - 
work which in the past I blithely accepted - I find that it is no 
better grounded than the work of the climate change deniers such as 
Lord Monkton and Ian Plimer and Christopher Booker and the rest of it 
that I have been confronting for all these years. In fact um his 
statistical mistakes were so profound that in order to demonstrate 
that there was the leukaemia rate he said there was, which is not 
backed up by any medical records anywhere, he actually had to create 
a negative rate for all other cancers in Wales. In other words every 
year there is minus a certain number of cancers taking place in 
Wales, which is a rather hard proposition to support scientifically. 
I am glad you raised it because it's indicative of of of exactly the 
problems we are up against. And it was a s-s-s-s-source of sadness to 
me to discover that that was happening."
This must have puzzled Monbiot's audience but the person who sent the 
recording realised that he was trying to shoot the detective in a 
long-running investigation into how radioactivity in the Irish Sea 
migrates onto the land and causes cancer. The quest began in 1994 
when the Wales Cancer Registry (WCR) drew attention to high levels of 
cancer in children. In 1995 and 1996 we obtained two separate copies 
of all the detailed data held by WCR. In fact, LLRC is now the only 
organisation that possesses the data since in 1996 WCR was closed 
down and its computers were, allegedly, wiped.
Examining the data we quickly saw that the highest risks were along 
the shores of the Irish Sea; all age groups were affected.

Official reports had already shown plutonium originating from 
Sellafield is widespread in marine sediments across the Irish Sea. 
Resuspended by wave action and carried inland on the prevailing 
westerly winds, Sellafield's plutonium has been measured in grass and 
sheep droppings all the way across England to the North Sea.
[]

Gwynedd, the Menai and Anglesey: Intertidal sediment (yellow) and 
Plutonium (Becquerels/Kg)
The highest levels by far are within a kilometer of the Irish Sea. So 
what we saw in the WCR data supported our hypothesis that low 
concentrations of some forms of radioactivity are far more dangerous 
than Government officials and the nuclear industry want you to 
believe. Inhalation is almost certainly the most hazardous vector.
[]

Plutonium in sheep droppings (mBq/Kg) by distance eastward (km) from 
St. Bees Head, Cumbria

We published our findings. There was national (UK) news coverage and 
BBC Wales made a TV documentary, Sea of Troubles. This was Wales' own 
rerun of Windscale, The Nuclear Laundry, the Yorkshire TV programme 
which in 1983 had revealed the existence of a 12-fold excess rate of 
child leukaemia in Seascale, a village near Sellafield (as the 
Windscale nuclear site was subsequently relabelled).
The Welsh Assembly and Westminster governments both referred our 
information to COMARE, the advisory Committee on Medical Aspects of 
Radiation in the Environment, set up after the Seascale scandal.
[]

The only school photograph of 
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gemma_D'Arcy>Gemma D'Arcy, one of the 
leukaemia victims in the Cumbrian cluster. She died before her 
seventh birthday.

[]

John A Steward, director of WCISU from 1997 COMARE took a kangaroo 
court approach, hearing evidence from the new cancer registry, the 
Welsh Cancer Intelligence and Surveillance Unit (WCISU), but not from 
us. WCISU's director, Dr John A Steward, claimed that he had repeated 
our methods using WCISU data. He found no extra cases on the coast 
and concluded that the WCR data were corrupt. COMARE member Dr. 
Gerald Draper, head of the Childhood Cancer Research Group, backed 
him up although in 1995 WCR had told us Draper himself had validated 
the Welsh data and that the high risks on the coast were real. But of 
course we weren't there to tell COMARE this. They and Welsh Assembly 
officials condemned our findings and demanded we recant.
We did not recant. Instead 
<http://www.llrc.org/llrc/rat/subrat/rat3215.html>we refuted 
Steward's claim to have repeated our analysis. He had used population 
data from a different census, he had diluted the high risks we found 
in a narrow band next to the sea by using a wider band, and he had 
taken 182 of the sick children off the WCR database and 50 off his 
own much more recent data. He still found a higher risk near the sea 
but it was no longer statistically significant.

In 2002 Linda Parry, a young HTV researcher from north Wales, visited 
LLRC to ask about the leukaemia controversy. To show her that there 
was independent confirmation of what we saw in the WCR data we gave 
her a copy of a letter published in 2001 in the Daily Post - a 
Liverpool-based paper that covers north Wales. A family had written 
to praise the staff at Alder Hey Hospital in Liverpool for their 
treatment of cancer children. They had realised, from talking with 
other parents in hospital waiting rooms, that childhood cancer 
incidence along the north Wales coast was very common. Using known 
populations we calculated that their figure of 10 new cancer cases a 
month represented 20 times the national rate. (The letter is cut to 
conceal personal information. Lib Rowland-Hughes, who sent the news 
clipping, had made contact with the little girl's grandfather. He 
told her that the child had been cured of Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma but 
was later diagnosed with Acute Myeloid Leukaemia. She died in 2003, 
two years after this letter was written.)
[]

Using her knowledge of north Wales, Linda eventually identified 40 
children diagnosed with leukaemia and cancer between 2000 and 2003. 
In the seaside towns of Caernarfon, Bangor and Colwyn Bay, where all 
the population lives within a mile of the sea, rates of leukaemia in 
children younger than 4 years were up to 20 times the national 
average. Rates of other cancers were also elevated. We looked 
separately at the more extensive rural areas nearby, where the 
population is not concentrated as close to the sea as in the towns. 
The rural population showed an 8-fold excess of child leukaemia, 
confirming the significance of the high urban rates. HTV used this 
analysis for a Welsh language documentary Cancr i Plant. We reported 
the findings to the 2004 international conference of the charity 
Children With Leukaemia in London and 
<http://www.llrc.org/llrc/health/subtopic/menai.html>reported in 
<http://www.llrc.org/llrc/health/subtopic/menai.html>Radioactive Times.

This was a problem for Dr. Steward because we had the children's 
names, ages, and home addresses, so he couldn't remove any more cases 
from database. It is very unlikely that Linda had located all the 
possible cases, but Steward had no idea which she had found and which 
she hadn't. WCISU admitted that the figures were high but they still 
denied their significance. They used two arguments. They said that if 
the disease were caused by radioactivity there would be a long-term 
trend, and they claimed there was no such trend. In fact, validated 
data from Wales Cancer Registry for 1982 to 1990 show there is a 
long-term trend. In the 1980s in the three worst affected towns, 
Caernarfon, Bangor and Colwyn Bay, children younger than 4 had eight 
times the national average rate of leukaemia.
Second, through using wrong documentation, they overestimated 
populations in north Wales. They thought the population of Bangor, 
for example, was more than three times as big as it really is. 
Accurate numbers for populations are essential, since they give 
epidemiologists the numbers of cases of a disease can be expected 
normally. WCISU are professional epidemiologists and their cock-up is 
barely credible especially since, in 2001, we had already warned 
Steward that he'd made exactly the same mistake in a separate study 
of cancer somewhere else. This has been published in the 
<http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/content/28/2/177.full.pdf>Journal 
of Public Health and Steward has offered no defence. The detail is in 
<http://www.llrc.org/llrc/health/subtopic/wcisureptfinal.pdf>this 
report with 
<http://www.llrc.org/llrc/health/subtopic/menaicoverup.html>more 
discussion here.
Faced with our analysis, COMARE admitted that Steward had made a 
mistake with the populations. Busby has discussed these matters at 
length in <http://www.llrc.org/llrc/wings/subtopic/wolves.html>Wolves 
of Water. The relevant part 
<http://www.llrc.org/llrc/wings/subtopic/wcrdatafromwolves.pdf>is here.

So that's the real story. Monbiot could hardly have got it more 
wrong. We wrote to him offering to talk him through the evidence but 
he was rudely defiant.


----------
A nice day out at the Hay Festival

[]
  As George said at the Left Hook talk in Liverpool, he lives not far 
from Busby. Richard Bramhall, LLRC's Company Secretary, also lives in 
mid-Wales so on 30th May it was a short trip to Hay on Wye where 
George was appearing at the Hay Festival. We printed up a leaflet 
telling the bare outline of how he had defamed a conscientious 
scientist and how he was afraid to have a public debate. We pointed 
out that less than two years earlier, when climate-change sceptic Ian 
Plimer was reluctant to take part in a debate, George had labelled 
him a grandstander with a broad yellow stripe. That's why the poster 
has a broad yellow stripe.
(The slogan There's No Debate You're Chicken George was first 
deployed against George W Bush in the 1992 US Presidential election 
campaign, when Bush was refusing to meet Bill Clinton in front of the 
cameras.)
[]
  We leafletted a queue of people waiting to hear George Monbiot 
(this is Richard Bramhall doing his share).
Two men angrily thrust the leaflets back. They claimed that Busby had 
slandered their friend Dr. John Steward - the Director of the Welsh 
Cancer Intelligence and Surveillance Unit.
One of these men is in the next two frames - the photographer didn't 
catch the other.
[]
  They said they knew Steward because they worked for the Welsh 
Assembly. Bramhall explained that Steward had made a mistake with the 
leukaemia data, inflating the populations of the study areas by 300%, 
thus underestimating the risk by 300%. He pointed out that this had 
been published 
<http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/content/28/2/177.full.pdf>in 
the scientific literature and that Steward hadn't answered. That 
seemed to slow them down a bit but one still said he preferred to 
believe in his friend, while the other (pictured) said there was no 
mechanism for the low levels of radioactivity on the coast to cause leukaemia.
[]
  Bramhall said "If that's what you think, you're relying on a 
concept of dose that is known to be meaningless, so let's have the 
debate - my contact details are on the leaflet." Like Monbiot, they 
haven't taken up the offer of a civilised discussion.

----------
[]
  Why is George so sure he's right? Well, he's read a blog by his 
friends Chris Goodall and Mark Lynas 
(<http://www.monbiot.com/2011/03/31/seven-double-standards/>here he 
calls them 
<http://www.monbiot.com/2011/03/31/seven-double-standards/>two 
environmentalists who have kept their heads in this crisis - that is 
the Fukushima crisis). Goodall and Lynas have read Radiation and 
Reason: The Impact of Science on a Culture of Fear, by a professor of 
physics, Wade Allison. Bramhall has 
<http://www.amazon.co.uk/product-reviews/0956275613/ref=dp_db_cm_cr_acr_txt?ie=UTF8&showViewpoints=1>reviewed 
Radiation and 
Reason<http://www.amazon.co.uk/product-reviews/0956275613/ref=dp_db_cm_cr_acr_txt?ie=UTF8&showViewpoints=1> 
on Amazon showing that Allison has torpedoed his own project by 
altogether ignoring microdosimetry. See 
<http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/apr/20/chernobyl-radiation-risk-dose-density?INTCMP=SRCH>this 
short piece which explains the vital importance of microdosimetry - 
it means Allison has made a massive averaging error, which is like 
believing that a stab in the back is no worse than a pat on the back.

Don't take our word for it; here are damning reviews of Radiation and 
Reason from two senior figures in the conventional radiation 
protection community - 
<http://www.kbaverstock.org/Book%20review%20Final.pdf>Professor Keith 
Baverstock formerly of WHO and
<http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0952-4746/30/2/B01/pdf>Mike 
Thorne, a former Scientific Secretary to the International Commission 
on Radiological Protection
to say nothing of avowedly anti-nuclear 
<http://peacenews.info/node/5133/wade-allison-radiation-and-reason-impact-science-culture-fear>Peace 
News

And finally, here is Malcolm Grimston who graduated from Cambridge 
University in 1979 having read natural sciences, specialising in 
psychology. In 1987 he went to work at the UK Atomic Energy Agency 
and he is well known as a ruthless and intimidating pro-nuclear 
propagandist. LLRC has met him many times and he appeared frequently 
on TV after Fukushima, playing down the gravity of the disaster.
So what is Malcolm doing here? Well, between leaving university and 
going to UKAEA he taught chemistry at Stowe School where one of his 
pupils was little George Monbiot. Funny world isn't it.


<http://www.llrc.org/pronuke/monbiot/monbiot2.html>Next, Monbiot gets 
offensive in <http://www.llrc.org/pronuke/monbiot/monbiot2.html>The Guardian



George Monbiot goes on the offensive in print:
The Guardian, November 2011
[]
  In November 2011 The Guardian published two articles in which 
Monbiot repeated what he had said about childhood leukaemia during 
his Left Hook lecture tour earlier in the year. He also launched a 
fresh attack on Professor Chris Busby and the advice he was giving to 
people in Japan to protect themselves from radioactive discharges 
from Fukushima. He accused Busby of exploiting people's fears for 
personal profit.
<http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/nov/21/christopher-busby-radiation-pills-fukushima>Guardian<http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/nov/21/christopher-busby-radiation-pills-fukushima> 
21st November
<http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/georgemonbiot/2011/nov/22/christopher-busby-nuclear-green-party>Guardian<http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/georgemonbiot/2011/nov/22/christopher-busby-nuclear-green-party> 
22nd November.
In preparing these articles he bullied Busby and ignored information 
supplied by LLRC, as Richard Bramhall 
<http://www.llrc.org/pronuke/monbiot/monbiotbully.html>reports here.
[]


Monbiot was mentored by nuclear enthusiast Professor Geraldine Thomas 
of Imperial College, London (pictured left). She criticised Busby's 
advice on precautions against radioactivity from Fukushima, saying:
radioactive elements do not bind to DNA which shows how little 
[Professor Busby] understands about basic radiobiology
Professor Busby's assertion that Caesium causes heart disease was ludicrous
administering stable Calcium and Strontium is useless (in fact it's 
standard medical advice).
Wrong, wrong and wrong. 
<http://www.llrc.org/pronuke/monbiot/monbiot22nov2011.html>See here 
for the science and 
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E4Kkuo-IK-A>watch why low levels of 
radio-Caesium damage children's hearts.

<http://www.llrc.org/pronuke/monbiot/thomasguardcomments22112011amendfeb2017.pdf>We 
wrote to Professor Thomas. She replied I stand by the comments I made 
to George Monbiot during his research for this article.
<http://www.llrc.org/pronuke/monbiot/thomasmenace.html>More bizarre 
views from Professor Thomas -- on Chernobyl, Fukushima, and stable 
Uranium<http://www.llrc.org/pronuke/monbiot/thomasmenace.html>.
[]


In 
<http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/georgemonbiot/2011/nov/22/christopher-busby-nuclear-green-party>the 
same article Monbiot suggested that Professor Busby was seeking to 
profit financially from the distress of people in Japan by selling 
goods and services at inflated prices. This is far from the truth. No 
payments had been made to the bank account Monbiot referred to. The 
Foundation was quickly blocked by legal moves in Japan and imports of 
the products were banned, so there were no sales. Even if these 
obstacles had not been created, the formal non-profit agreement 
between Busby and the businessman who wanted to create the Foundation 
was that any profits would be ploughed back into further research. 
<http://www.llrc.org/pronuke/monbiot/monbiot21nov2011.html>Rebuttal 
from Professor Busby.
[]


In the same article (21 Nov.'11) Monbiot expressed his faith in the 
effectiveness of the Japanese government's precautions at Fukushima. 
People in Japan criticised him in an email to The Guardian. 
<http://www.llrc.org/pronuke/monbiot/monbiot24nov2011.html>Here is 
their message, which they copied to LLRC.
[]


[]


The Lord Mayor of Oxford invited Busby and Monbiot to debate the 
science in a public meeting in Oxford Town Hall on 3rd November 2011 
(in the hall pictured, left). Monbiot declined. The meeting went 
ahead without him. See the video 
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cjTHpq54mz8>here, part 1 and 
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1oX1w2xv110>part 2 here.


Monbiot repeated his opinions in the 
<http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/dec/05/sellafield-nuclear-energy-solution>Guardian<http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/dec/05/sellafield-nuclear-energy-solution> 
on 5th December.

Alan Rusbridger - Editor in Chief at the Guardian until 2015 
(pictured left) - never allowed Busby space to respond. So much for 
the paper's stance as a champion of liberal values.

Richard Bramhall: 27th November 2011. Updated February 2017


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.gn.apc.org/pipermail/diggers350/attachments/20220107/faf33fa7/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: fac6f57.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 10477 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.gn.apc.org/pipermail/diggers350/attachments/20220107/faf33fa7/attachment-0019.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: fac6f96.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 11966 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.gn.apc.org/pipermail/diggers350/attachments/20220107/faf33fa7/attachment-0020.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: fac6fa5.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 18259 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.gn.apc.org/pipermail/diggers350/attachments/20220107/faf33fa7/attachment-0021.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: fac6fb5.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 39448 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.gn.apc.org/pipermail/diggers350/attachments/20220107/faf33fa7/attachment-0022.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: fac6fc4.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 28286 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.gn.apc.org/pipermail/diggers350/attachments/20220107/faf33fa7/attachment-0023.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: fac6fd4.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 14704 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.gn.apc.org/pipermail/diggers350/attachments/20220107/faf33fa7/attachment-0024.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: fac6fe4.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 19281 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.gn.apc.org/pipermail/diggers350/attachments/20220107/faf33fa7/attachment-0025.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: fac6ff3.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 116052 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.gn.apc.org/pipermail/diggers350/attachments/20220107/faf33fa7/attachment-0026.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: fac7003.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 24489 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.gn.apc.org/pipermail/diggers350/attachments/20220107/faf33fa7/attachment-0027.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: fac7012.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 17281 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.gn.apc.org/pipermail/diggers350/attachments/20220107/faf33fa7/attachment-0028.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: fac7022.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 18877 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.gn.apc.org/pipermail/diggers350/attachments/20220107/faf33fa7/attachment-0029.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: fac7032.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 15821 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.gn.apc.org/pipermail/diggers350/attachments/20220107/faf33fa7/attachment-0030.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: fac7041.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 26934 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.gn.apc.org/pipermail/diggers350/attachments/20220107/faf33fa7/attachment-0031.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: fac7051.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 11926 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.gn.apc.org/pipermail/diggers350/attachments/20220107/faf33fa7/attachment-0032.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: fac7060.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 6536 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.gn.apc.org/pipermail/diggers350/attachments/20220107/faf33fa7/attachment-0033.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: fac7070.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 32223 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.gn.apc.org/pipermail/diggers350/attachments/20220107/faf33fa7/attachment-0034.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: fac7080.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 6563 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.gn.apc.org/pipermail/diggers350/attachments/20220107/faf33fa7/attachment-0035.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: fac708f.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 27663 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.gn.apc.org/pipermail/diggers350/attachments/20220107/faf33fa7/attachment-0036.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: fac709f.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 7599 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.gn.apc.org/pipermail/diggers350/attachments/20220107/faf33fa7/attachment-0037.jpg>