[Diggers350] Farmer/author James Rebanks: ‘I hate the word rewilding – it’s been weaponised’

[Tony Gosling]

Farmer and author James Rebanks: ‘I hate the word 
rewilding – it’s been weaponised’

https://tlio.org.uk/rewilding-britain-timeline-cover-for-private-equitys-global-enclosures-by-stealth-and-pantheism/

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/10/06/james-rebanks-interview-farmer-author-defra/

Ahead of the publication of his third book, he 
talks about turning down Defra, his fears for UK 
farming and a life-changing trip to Norway

It has been a hectic few months for farmer and 
author James Rebanks, what with his family’s farm 
in the Lake District to tend, as well as a 
much-anticipated new book, the follow up to his 
prize-winning best-sellers The Shepherd’s Life 
and English Pastoral. To add to the pressure, 
over the summer he received an invitation from 
the new government asking him to sit on the board 
of directors of the Department for Environment 
Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), the ministry 
responsible for the nation’s agriculture.

Emacs!

https://www.penguin.co.uk/books/315745/the-place-of-tides-by-rebanks-james/9780241426937

No wonder, then, that when we meet on his farm, 
tucked away in a vibrantly green Cumbrian valley 
in Gowbarrow Fell, 1,100 feet up in the hills 
between Keswick and Penrith, 50-year-old Rebanks 
is running rather than walking as he shows me its 
500 acres where they keep Herdwick sheep and Galloway cows.

“I turned Defra down,” he says. “Mostly because 
of my fundamental problems with Defra about budget.”

For much of our time together, the 
straight-talking, personable Rebanks is all 
smiles and jokes. At school, he recalls, before 
he left at 16 with just two GCSEs, “I was rough 
round the edges, and only good at making people laugh.”

But when he talks about farm budgets he is deadly 
serious. It is a measure of just how deep he 
believes the crisis in farming to be.

With Brexit, the £2.4 billion in subsidies based 
on acreage paid to British farmers by the EU 
under the old Common Agricultural Policy are in 
the process of being replaced by Defra with a 
system that instead rewards good environmental 
stewardship. Rebanks wholeheartedly approves of 
the direction of travel, “but we haven’t 
delivered on the new deal and farmers can’t go on living on air”.

They are telling him, he reports, that because of 
delays, shelf-loads of bureaucracy and general 
“ineptitude”, the ministry is effectively 
standing by while their old-style subsidy 
payments are tapered off, without giving farmers 
access to the promised new funding for nature 
that is meant to replace them. “Some farmers have 
lost as much as 38 per cent of their income. They 
can’t get on the new scheme unless they have a 
Natural England adviser prepared to treat them 
seriously enough to process their application and 
there aren’t enough advisers,” he says.

In such a chaotic situation, he has been one of 
the lucky ones. His money has come through, but 
overall he labels the transformation as a 
“tragedy”. “There are literally hundreds and 
thousands of farmers wanting to do amazing things 
for nature on their land who are being turned away,” he says.

To add insult to injury, in his eyes, Defra 
recently announced a £358 million underspend in 
the agricultural budget over the last three 
years. “That sounds to anyone not in farming as 
if farmers don’t want that money, aren’t trying 
to claim it. That is not at all what is happening.”

His refusal of the Defra offer is beginning to 
make more sense. In his own case he can point out 
around the farm how the new funds are being used: 
to put back hedgerows to reverse an alarming drop 
in bio-diversity in the countryside; to restore 
rivers to their old meandering courses to reduce 
the risk of flooding in towns and cities 
downstream; and to replant lost species like 
betony in his pastures that “do remarkable things 
for degraded soil”. But far too many farmers are 
not able to get on with the job that needs doing 
and which they want to do because of a logjam at the top.

That should matter to all of us, he insists. 
“Insufficient capacity in Defra means we are not 
buying enough of the nature that we need. We are 
miles away from doing what we need to do to mend rural Britain.”

It quickly becomes clear, as Rebanks races ahead, 
that he is as passionate about the acres he farms 
– he stands in a line of “dog-and-stick” Cumbrian 
Hill farmers stretching back 600 years – as he is 
about just how vital such family farms are. “We 
need more small farmers but at the moment we are losing them.”

Economics are driving them to the wall at the 
same time science is suggesting they are crucial 
to our collective future. “The best farming, the 
evidence shows, is quite human-intensive, less 
mechanical, less mono-cultural vast fields of one 
thing. Our diet and our landscape need much more of a patchwork.”

Rebanks grew up on his farm, working as soon as 
he could walk alongside his father and his 
grandfather (the heroes of his first two books). 
That has given him a profound respect for 
tradition that sits sometimes awkwardly alongside 
his belief that farming has to adapt to the 
crisis in nature and to climate change.

Many of the improvements he is making on the farm 
fit broadly under the banner of rewilding. “I 
don’t like the word rewilding and the 
permutations of it. If rewilding means, do we 
need more nature in our landscape, I absolutely own it.”

Other uses, though, annoy him. “My problem is the 
word is weaponised and then you have rewilders 
saying: ‘Your farm takes up too much room, James, 
that’s space we want for the wild.’ I get it, but 
I’m not going anywhere, and neither can I because I have to pay my bills.”

He continues: “What really bugs me about 
rewilding is when it simply becomes greenwashing. 
If you are a government not following through on 
your promises to transform 70 to 80 per cent of 
the countryside to make it better, you do some 
token rewilding bits here and there, flagship 
projects you can take people round.”

Farming can be a fraught business. “There are,” 
Rebanks reflects, trying to be more diplomatic, 
“people on both sides of this debate playing 
culture wars, and I am in the middle.” And, he 
adds, getting caught in the crossfire, because of 
the public profile his books and numerous public 
appearances have given him (which, of course, is 
why Defra wants him on board).

“I believe in compromise, but the current 
situation leads to grumpy farmers who no longer 
trust government or environmentalists, and a 
whole new breed of rabble rousers who know 
exactly how to play to their own tribe,” he says.

Rebanks is sometimes referred to as “Britain’s 
best-known farmer”, but surely that crown belongs 
to Jeremy Clarkson? “He is massively helpful,” 
Rebanks says, “whether you like him or not. I’m 
not a petrol head but he’s got people seeing how 
insane the economics of farming are. I’ve had 
more non-farmers approach me to talk about 
farming because of Clarkson’s Farm than anything 
else that has happened in the last 15 years.”

The sins Rebanks attributes to Defra happened 
under Conservative ministers. Does he think the 
incoming Labour team might do better?

He has just come back, he tells me, from 
attending a fringe meeting at this autumn’s 
Labour party conference. “I’ve never done 
anything like that before in my life. I’ve never 
been to anything political.” He is not even a 
member of the National Farmers’ Union (NFU).

Yet the farming minister, Daniel Zeichner, who 
has also been praised in these pages earlier this 
year by Tom Bradshaw, current president of the 
NFU, has visited the Rebanks’ farm not once but twice.

“He’s saying the right things. I’m absolutely 
confident he believes in a compromise between 
farming and nature, but I am not absolutely 
confident that he is going to in an argument with 
the Treasury on the right amount of money so we have the nature we need.”

If he doesn’t in Rachel Reeves’ forthcoming 
budget, what will be the consequence? “Instead of 
a gain of nature as has been planned, I think we 
are going to have a loss of nature. If you short 
change the spend, we all lose. It is very simple,” says Rebanks.

His passion for restoring nature is what took him 
to Norway for his new book, The Place of Tides, 
to a remote, uninhabited rocky island on the edge 
of the coastal shelf in the Vega archipelago, a 
Unesco World Heritage Site. He spent 10 weeks 
there working alongside two elderly women, Anna 
and Ingrid. Each spring they are single-handedly 
reviving a long-standing tradition of protecting 
nesting eider ducks, and harvesting their 
feathers once they leave their nests for duvets.

It feels like a bit of a departure from the very 
English setting and subject matter of his two 
previous books. “I went there,” he explains, “to 
get away from people, from history, to step out 
of all the stuff that worries me in the world.”

The trip also came four years after the death of 
his father, Tom, from cancer. Their relationship 
hadn’t always been easy, especially in his late 
teens when he left school and they were working side by side on the farm.

“At the time it was getting a bit desperate 
financially, he was getting a bit nasty, I was 
getting a bit uppity. There were some nasty fights.”

It was only in retrospect, he says, that he 
realised that taking himself off to a remote 
Norwegian island was a form of grieving. “In the 
years before I went there, I’d lost my dad, my 
aunties and all that older generation that 
anchored me, but on the island I found myself with people who were like them.”

He remembers shaking Anna’s hand for the first 
time. “I got a chill. Her hands felt like my 
grandmother’s hands, boney, sinewy, working-class 
hands. She was my people. She didn’t give a toss about my books.”

He makes it sound as though he had reached a 
crisis point in his life, yet inside his Cumbrian 
farmhouse, an old barn that he has been able to 
extend with the significant royalties from his 
books to better accommodate his growing family of 
four, Molly, Bea, Isaac and Tom, aged from seven 
to 18, the atmosphere is unmistakably one of warmth and love and life.

His two sons are just home from school, his 
mother-in-law is helping with the school-run, 
while Bea, who works on the farm and wants to 
follow in his footsteps, pops in and out. Missing 
is Rebanks’ wife, Helen, who in 2023 published 
her own book, The Farmer’s Wife, which followed 
her husband’s into the best-sellers’ charts.

Are they setting themselves up to become the 
real-life Phil and Jill Archer for the nation? He 
smiles. “I’ve only ever listened to The Archers 
for half an episode. That was enough”.

His wife is currently on a trip to London to see 
a stage dramatisation of her book. Will there be 
similar adaptations of his books? “I must have 
been asked about 20 times to be in a documentary 
about my life and I’ve turned them all down. I 
don’t like being recognised any more than I am.”

Helen came from another farming family and grew 
up close by. “She was the swotty, academic 
farmer’s daughter, determined to get out of the 
small town we had gone to school in. We met when I was 21 and she was 17.”

He credits her with awakening ambition in him 
after a misspent, “rough-round-the-edges” youth, 
encouraging him to go to night school to get his 
A-levels, and landing a place at Magdalen College, Oxford, to read history.

“I didn’t like it,” he recalls of his university 
days. “I had a vague, chippy and I now realise 
completely pointless hatred of whoever ‘them’ 
was, as if everyone at Oxford was one thing and I 
had to beat them. I could have enjoyed it more.”

It didn’t stop him getting a double first. His 
initial plan had been to use Oxford as a stepping 
stone to get a job that would pay him enough to save the farm.

Instead, he returned after graduating to work on 
the farm, but it had given him the courage in his 
spare time to attempt to realise an ambition to 
write that he had developed while reading his way 
through the novels on his “obsessively bookish” 
mother’s shelves. It is a habit he still makes 
time to indulge in, having just finished the 
Booker Prize shortlist (Percival Everett’s James is his top tip).

The Place of Tides, marks quite a shift in his 
writing, more novel than memoir, realised in 
rhythmic, poetic language. But it is familiar 
territory, namely his struggle to balance the 
timeless with the timely, tradition with the 
changes that need to be made for a changing future.

He first caught a glimpse of Anna on a 2012 visit 
to Norway. To make ends meet he had taken on some 
consultancy work on sustainability for Unesco. “I 
got 40 minutes off the coast, looked back at this 
panorama of mountains and rocks and sea and 
thought: ‘This might be the best place I’ve ever, ever been.’”

It’s quite a compliment for someone who believes 
his farm in the Lake District is the place he 
always wants to live. But something else caught his eye that day.

“These quiet, unheralded women were working out 
there with the eider ducks and I was curious. I 
remember thinking at the time: ‘I wonder if 
anyone else has written about this?’”

The challenge of finding a subject for his third 
book revived the memory. “I was probably a little 
bit dazed and confused after the first two 
books,” he concedes. “All sorts of weird things 
come out of success.” His second book, English 
Pastoral, won the Wainwright Prize for nature 
writing and was – like his debut, The Shepherd’s 
Life, translated into more than a dozen languages.

With his family’s blessing, he returned to spend 
the duck season with Anna and Ingrid. Anna comes 
from a long line of men and women who have done 
this work, stretching all the way back to a 
great, great grandfather in 1852. Nowadays, 
though, the tradition is teetering on the edge of extinction.

“I went there to get away from my worries about 
the future, but it was there. The sea is broken 
[by overfishing that has decimated the local 
fishing industry]. The people are getting old...”

 From his trip to Norway he has brought back a 
variety of things. “It was the first time I had 
spent time in a place dominated by women, with 
women’s rules. I had to really think about that, 
embarrassingly, for the first time in my life.”

And on the farm? “I came back determined to mend 
home as Anna was determined to mend her island 
and its ecosystem. On the farm, we had been doing 
our bit, but we have definitely gone up a gear.”

He believes they are doing “the best farming we 
have ever done. We might now be one of the most 
progressive farms in Britain on transforming our 
soil. We have 15 worms per spade-full, when our 
neighbours have four. We need more worms in the soil.”

Not, he adds, that the day-to-day headaches of hill-farming ever go away.

“One of the biggest problems for anyone who farms 
around here is dogs off-lead that attack sheep. 
If we walk up the fell now where my sheep are, I 
can guarantee that there will be at least three 
people walking with their dogs off-lead, despite 
the signs telling them not to. They have an amazing sense of entitlement.”

What does he do when he catches them? “I give 
them a stern telling off. My dad would have said their dogs should be shot.”

Another medium-term cloud on the horizon is one 
that hovers over many family farms – succession. 
How will he sort it out with four children?

He shakes his head. “I haven’t got a clue what 
the perfect succession looks like when the 
capital value of land is wildly higher than its 
agricultural value because it is a tax dodge for corporates and pension funds.”

I can’t help thinking that whatever his 
reservations, accepting a seat round the Defra 
table would enable this articulate and thoughtful 
man at least a chance to impact on government 
policy in such matters. But then he has been 
burnt once already. In 2018 he resigned shortly 
after joining a Defra panel set up by then 
Secretary of State, Michael Gove, after 
environmentalists complained it had too many farmers on it.

Isn’t he actually both – farmer and 
environmentalist? “Yes,” he replies with a laugh. 
“And I need to show that there is a place for 
farmers like me in the environment of the future, 
and that we can deliver multiple things from the same piece of land.”

The Place of Tides by James Rebanks is published 
by Allen Lane on October 17 at £22








See King Charles III's $25 billion Real Estate Portfolio

Giovana Gelhoren May 4, 2023,

https://www.forbes.com/sites/giacomotognini/2023/05/04/inside-king-charles-iiis-25-billion-real-estate-empire/

As the reigning monarch of the United Kingdom, 
<https://www.sheknows.com/tags/king-charles-iii/>King 
Charles III is the owner of many opulent royal 
residences across Britain. After 
<https://www.sheknows.com/entertainment/slideshow/2221482/queen-elizabeth-ii-dress-hat-collection/>Queen 
Elizabeth II passed away in September 2022, 
Charles officially became the King in a lavish 
2023 coronation and thus took over duties and 
properties previously owned by his mother.

According to a deep dive into the properties from 
<https://www.forbes.com/sites/giacomotognini/2022/10/21/inside-king-charles-iiis-25-billion-real-estate-empire/?sh=7995704641ec>Forbes, 
Charles now owns seven palaces, 10 castles, 12 
homes, 56 holiday cottages and 14 ancient ruins. 
The elaborate real estate portfolio is known as 
the Duchy of Lancaster estate, a private and 
ancient estate owned by the reigning sovereign. 
The estate has been passed down to the next King or Queen for over 750 years.

As if that deal wasn’t already sweet enough, 
Charles wasn’t required to pay inheritance tax on 
the luxurious real estate due to a rule 
introduced by the UK government in 1993. Per 
<https://www.businessinsider.com/charles-doesnt-have-to-pay-inheritance-tax-750-million-estate-2022-9>Business 
Insider, the rule doesn’t require the Royal 
Family to pay the same tax as other UK citizens 
to prevent the royal family’s assets being wiped 
out if two monarchs were to die in a short period of time.

Properties include massive estates that are known 
across the globe, such as Buckingham Palace and 
Windsor Castle, but there are also some lesser 
known properties that have been in the family for generations.

Though one might think that larger and more 
expensive is better, Charles disagrees. A source 
recently told the 
<https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-11323027/King-Charles-WONT-Buckingham-Palace-fit-purpose-modern-world.html>Daily 
Mail that the royal might be thinking of breaking 
royal protocol by 
<https://www.sheknows.com/entertainment/articles/2643134/king-charles-new-home-buckingham-palace/>not 
moving to Buckingham Palace at the end of its 
renovation in 2027 (the Palace is worth an 
estimated $4.9 billion, per Forbes). “I know he 
is no fan of ‘the big house,’ as he calls the 
palace,” the source said. “He doesn’t see it as a 
viable future home or a house that’s fit for 
purpose in the modern world.” The source 
continued, “He feels that its upkeep, both from a 
cost and environmental perspective, is not sustainable.”

Thus, the King seemingly spends most of his time 
in other properties and we have all the details 
about where they are.  Below you’ll see some of 
Charles’ most extravagant and opulent estates, palaces and cottages!


How King Charles and Prince William's royal 
estates earn millions in rent from taxpayers

Sat 02 Nov 2024

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/how-king-charles-prince-williams-34022693

The two most senior royals make £50m a year from 
their inherited estates – as revealed by a 
bombshell new Mirror and Channel 4 Dispatches investigation

The two royal Duchies of Cornwall and Lancaster, 
owned by Prince William and King Charles III, 
earn millions of pounds in rent from the taxpayer.

Details of how the two most senior members of the 
Royal Family make £50m a year from their 
inherited estates can be revealed for the first time.

It owns the coastline from Barrow-in-Furness to 
the River Mersey and five leases reveal the Duchy 
will received at least £28m from power cables crossing this land.

A Duchy of Cornwall spokesperson it was “a 
private estate with a commercial imperative”.

The Duchy of Lancaster said it “operates as a 
commercial company” and that “while His Majesty 
The King takes a close interest in the work of 
the Duchy, the day-to-day management of the 
portfolio is the responsibility of the Council and executive team”.




King Charles doesn't have to pay inheritance tax 
on the Queen's private estate worth more than $750 million

Jyoti Mann Sep 11, 2022,

https://www.businessinsider.com/charles-doesnt-have-to-pay-inheritance-tax-750-million-estate-2022-9?op=1

     King Charles has inherited the Duchy of 
Lancaster estate valued at more than $750 million.
     He will not have to pay inheritance tax on 
the estate due to a rule approved in 1993.
     The duchy generated income of $27 million 
for the Queen last year, financial records show.

King Charles will not have to pay inheritance tax 
on the Duchy of Lancaster estate he inherited 
from the Queen due to a rule allowing assets to 
be passed from one sovereign to another.

Charles automatically inherited the estate, the 
monarch's primary source of income, while his 
eldest son, Prince William, inherited the Duchy 
of Cornwall estate - valued at more than $1 billion - from his father.

The new king will avoid inheritance tax on the 
estate worth more than $750 million due to a rule 
introduced by the UK government in 1993 to guard 
against the royal family's assets being wiped out 
if two monarchs were to die in a short period of time, i News reported.

The provision was first exercised in 2002 when 
the Queen Mother passed on an estate worth about 
$80 million to the Queen including a collection of Faberge eggs.

The clause means that, to help protect its 
assets, members of the royal family do not have 
to pay the 40% levy on property valued at more 
than £325,000 ($377,000) that non-royal UK residents do.

The Lancaster estate generated revenue of £24 
million ($27 million) last year, its financial 
records state, and the King is now entitled to its income.
Advertisement

It had assets worth more than £650 million ($754 
million) at the end of March this year, the 
duchy's website states. A law passed in 1702 
forbids the monarch from selling any of the assets.

The Queen began voluntarily paying income and 
capital gains tax on the estate in 1993 and Charles may decide to follow suit.

The Duchy of Lancaster estate, founded in the 
13th century, consists of "commercial, 
agricultural and residential" properties, 
including a portfolio of financial investments, according to its website.

Its five rural units, or Surveys, cover about 
18,000 hectares of land in England and Wales.

The Foreshore Survey covers about 36,000 hectares 
(one hectare is equal to about two and a half 
acres) from the river Mersey, on which the city 
of Liverpool is built, to Barrow-in-Furness in 
the north of England. It also consists of the 
Minerals Survey, comprising limestone and 
sandstone quarries from south Wales to North Yorkshire.

However, most of its income comes from the Urban 
Survey, which includes extensive commercial 
property interests in central London such as the Savoy Hotel.

The Balmoral and Sandringham residences are owned 
by the royal family, while most of the other 
properties they use including Buckingham Palace 
and Windsor Castle are part of the Crown Estate.

The Duchy of Lancaster was contacted for comment.
















-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.gn.apc.org/pipermail/diggers350/attachments/20241106/dc65337e/attachment-0002.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 9aa6421b.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 114361 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.gn.apc.org/pipermail/diggers350/attachments/20241106/dc65337e/attachment-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
Weekly politics show page http://www.thisweek.org.uk
Radio stream live 5pm Fridays and repeated 
11am/pm UK time http://www.talkradio.org.uk
Also on: NOT The BCfm Politics Show App 
https://apkpure.com/not-the-bcfm-politics-show/com.sweetsmile.bottom_navigation_flutter 


NB please reply with any unsubscribe request in 
the email body, leaving the subject line intact, 
if you do not wish to recieve further emails - thanks
And it came to pass, as he sat at meat with them, 
he took bread, and blessed it, and brake, and 
gave to them. 
<http://biblehub.com/luke/24-31.htm>31 And their 
eyes were opened, and they knew him; and he 
vanished out of their sight.  http://biblehub.com/kjv/luke/24.htm
'Capitalism is institutionalised bribery' TG - 
Cancelled -> https://www.youtube.com/user/PublicEnquiry/videos


Albert Pike’s 1871 
<https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/650822/Letter-WW3-200-year-old-islam-final-battle>WWIII 
plan to cancel God – 
<https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/may/11/accelerationism-how-a-fringe-philosophy-predicted-the-future-we-live-in>Accelerationist 
multicrisis: my schoolfriend 
<https://www.philosophyforlife.org/blog/accelerationism-amphetamine-philosophy-and-the-death-trip>‘Nazi 
Nick’s Dark Enlightenment ‘death trip’ is 
designed to 
<https://qz.com/1007144/the-neo-fascist-philosophy-that-underpins-both-the-alt-right-and-silicon-valley-technophiles>discredit 
all democracy
Essentials: 
<https://www.bitchute.com/video/AH8pJ8vLnpQQ/>Michael 
Hudson | 
<https://www.bitchute.com/video/mlGKutbgByo4/>Blackrock/Vanguard 
| Tony 
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oAq1q1_swyM>on 
Brexit & 
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DsxxlpLccE8&pp=ygUWVGhlIFRyYWl0b3JzIG9mIEFybmhlbQ%3D%3D>The 
Traitors of Arnhem | 
<https://www.bitchute.com/video/s3keNigJaj63/>Evolution 
| 
<https://www.bitchute.com/video/Yhv9ZMby68Ig>War 
between God & Lucifer | 
<http://www.itsuandi.org/itsui/downloads/Itsui_Materials/Albert_Pike's_Plan_for_Three_World_Wars.pdf>Plan 
for three World Wars | Armageddonists I have 
known: 
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cXKz4uwZC_k>Nick 
Land (1975-8) | 
<https://www.bitchute.com/video/pkIIeuailaUt/>George 
Monbiot (1995-8) | Manna for the Revelation 
Generation: 
<https://www.radio4all.net/program/108328>CONSPIRACY 
CLASSICS, longer interviews/lectures

"And I think, in the end, that is the best 
definition of journalism I have heard; to 
challenge authority - all authority - especially 
so when governments and politicians take us to 
war, when they have decided that they will kill 
and others will die. " --Robert Fisk
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMn9GM4atN3t7AHJBbHMR0Q/videos
http://www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://www.thisweek.org.uk
http://www.911forum.org.uk
http://www.tlio.org.uk
Tony's free watermarked books www.bilderberg.org 
- My ebooks https://payhip.com/TonyGosling
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCvPbHiqhLtpNWA_cg_1NULw
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMn9GM4atN3t7AHJBbHMR0Q
https://www.twitter.com/TonyGosling
https://www.facebook.com/tony.gosling.16
You can donate to support Tony's work here http://www.bilderberg.org/bcfm.htm
Or buy Tony's three ebooks for £10-£15 here 
https://payhip.com/TonyGosling or paperback here 
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/254963338161
TG mobile +44 7786 952037

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.gn.apc.org/pipermail/diggers350/attachments/20241106/dc65337e/attachment-0003.html>