House-rationing - to end homelessness

[PHRTL at aol.com]

In WW2 we had food rationing.  Perhaps now we need "House rationing", in view 
of the fact housing is a basic human right, and homelessness is a negation of 
basic human rights. Britain is committed to basic human rights, but the 
citizens of Britain are denied that right. We congratulate the squatters who 
assert their basic human right of having a home peacefully and fighting a 
legal battle for it.
Mukhtar Rana - Peace & Human Rights Trust

Squatters move into £20m house 

Group living in Georgian building say they will go quietly when they are 
evicted 

Audrey Gillan
Saturday November 9, 2002
<A HREF="http://www.guardian.co.uk/">The Guardian</A> 
Ref: http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,836635,00.html
In terms of location, it can't be beaten. Step from the front door and you 
are right in the heart of central London's Covent Garden. You can see across 
the piazza and into the market or watch as workers add the finishing touches 
to the Covent Garden Christmas tree. There are shops, bars, clubs and the 
opera is just a stone's throw away. The main room has ornate plasterwork and 
a crystal chandelier. But this £20m Georgian townhouse is not occupied by one 
of Britain's rich. Instead, it has been taken over by 16 squatters who 
obtained a set of keys to the empty, listed building from someone they met at 
a party. Inflatable mattresses have been scattered throughout the rooms and a 
communal living area has been set up in a loft-style space at the top of the 
house. Paintings have been hung on the walls and one room has been decorated 
with African cloth, masks and a wooden armadillo. There is a portable 
television, a two-bar fire and a little electric grill. The heating, lighting 
and water are still working. In a bedroom there is a scattering of toiletries 
and clothing. A copy of Zola's L'Assomoir is lying on the floor and written 
in orange paint on the wall are the words: "Parlez moi d'amour." The 
squatters have been living in the house since late October. They moved in 
after they were evicted from a block of flats where they squatted for a year 
and a half in Gray's Inn Road. They say they are entitled to squat under 
section six of the Criminal Law Act 1977. The building, at 43 King Street, is 
owned by the insurance company Scottish Widows and the telecoms firm 
Henderson Global Investors through the Covent Garden Market Limited 
Partnership. They have referred the matter to court and hope that next week 
it will consider interim possession, which will lead to the squatters being 
evicted. Thomas, a 31-year-old from the west coast of Scotland, with a master 
in ceramics and design from Glasgow School of Art, admits "it's a bit cheeky" 
to be squatting in such a prime location. He shows us round the house and 
denies that it has been "vandalised", as was claimed, or that the squatters 
have been holding illegal raves. "We are decent people who just squat," he 
said. "We needed a place to live. We got the opportunity to get the keys for 
this place and no one was living here. It's a great location because none of 
us have to travel to work. "They just don't want us here and I can understand 
why. But we are keeping the place warm and we will leave when they ask us to 
legally. We are not troubling anyone." The people who live here all work. 
Emily, a French woman on a break from her job in a nearby shop, said: "I 
don't know where I will go when I get kicked out." Aurelie is a waitress, 
Nikolaus is a landscape gardener, and they said their wages were too low and 
London rents too high for them to afford to live elsewhere. There is a 
variety of nationalities, including French, Polish, Bulgarian and Israeli, 
and there is a woman and her 10-year-old daughter. There is even a dog, Lulu. 
Thomas said: "The reason that we squat is that we know the law. This building 
was doing nothing for over a year. "When they asked us to move before, we 
said, 'Can we have a day and half to get our stuff moved?' They said no and 
we said, 'OK, check section six.' If they can't get into the building without 
causing criminal damage then they have got to go away. "It wasn't much to 
ask, we have 16 people in a building, one of them is a kid. But we will go 
quietly when we have to." 

    


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/private/diggers350/attachments/20021111/ff0d97d1/attachment.html>