Pink Castle GM court case update
office at tlio.demon.co.uk
Thu Nov 6 14:22:55 GMT 2003
Pink Castle GM court case update
4 people arrested for locking on to tractors planting Bayer
CropScience GM maize in Dorset (next to the Pink Castle) have their
aquital over turned in the high court and now face retrial
CROPS PROTESTER FACING CONVICTION
Western Morning News 11:00 - 05 November 2003
Two of the UK's top judges have ruled that Totnes GM protester Liz
Snook should be found guilty of civil disobedience in a High Court
The High Court overturned a not guilty decision by a district judge
over her right to protest again GM maize trials by chaining herself
to a tractor. Lord Justice Brooke and Mr Justice Silber yesterday
ruled that the lower court was wrong, with a direction that she
should be convicted. The court allowed the challenge by the Director
of Public Prosecutions to the decision by Dorset magistrates who had
cleared Snook and three others of trespass in March. The district
judge at Sherborne Magistrates Court cleared 26-year-old Snook and
the others of causing a nuisance. The lower court ruled that she had
not acted unreasonably.
Lord Justice Brooke, rejected the protesters' defence that they were
defending property. "It is clear that the respondents knew quite well
that there was nothing unlawful about the drilling of GM maize seed
on the land, even if the seed might blow about or be transferred by
one means or another to neighbouring land. "
Lord Justice Brooke said the judge who cleared the protesters should
have accepted their defence was not allowable.
"The case must therefore be remitted to him with a direction to
convict, since no defence of lawful excuse is available to the
Snook, who has previous protest convictions, claimed at the
magistrates court she considered GM crops a "serious threat" to the
eco-system and that her protest had been "as a last resort."
However, the Director of Public Prosecutions, argued that there
was "no acceptable defence to the charges."
HIGH COURT SAYS GM PROTESTERS ARE GUILTY
Western Morning News
10:27 - 05 November 2003
Four gm crop protesters, including two from the Westcountry, have
been ordered by the High Court to be convicted of criminal offences
after shackling themselves to tractors during a demonstration.
In a successful appeal, the Director of Public Prosecutions won
orders overturning a district judge's decision to accept the
protesters' defence that they were protecting the environment.
In a ruling which will come as a blow to the anti-GM movement, Lord
Justice Brooke and Mr Justice Silber ruled: "In our judgment, the
district judge ought to have directed himself as a matter of law that
the defence of private defence or protective force was not available
to the respondents". The four were protesting against an experimental
trial involving genetically modified maize on farmland in Dorset.
Elizabeth Snook, of Totnes; Olaf Bayer, of Oxford; Richard Whistance,
from Catcott, Somerset; and William Hart, from Matlock, Derbyshire,
were acquitted of aggravated trespass by Judge Roger House, sitting
at Sherborne Magistrates' Court in March this year.
The four were prosecuted for leading a protest against a trial of
pesticide resistant GM-maize known as strain T-25 being planted at
the Horselynch Plantation at Littlemore, near Weymouth, Dorset, on
May 16 last year. As well as building a large wooden pink castle by
the site entrance, the four disrupted the start of the trial by
strapping and locking themselves to tractors which were preparing to
sew the GM seeds. At one point during the magistrates' court hearing,
Snook, who had been convicted of similar acts of protest in the past,
broke down in tears.
She said: "All I wanted to do was to stop the planting of that field.
We did what we did as a last resort."
After two days of evidence, the district judge said the four had
acted in a "reasonable" way, adding: "I can see you all have huge
knowledge of GM crops and I can see you were acting to protect the
land and animals."
But yesterday Lord Justice Brooke and Mr Justice Silber said the
district judge had erred in law.
More information about the Diggers350