Nine Ladies protest site - in Court Thursday
tliouk
office at tlio.demon.co.uk
Wed Jan 21 13:39:44 GMT 2004
The Nine Ladies protest site. Set up in 1999 to stop a proposed
3.2million tonnes being extracted from the beautiful and historically
important Peak District National Park. The camp is about to be
evicted allowing the destruction of 30 hectares of land. Papers were
served on Monday 19th Jan, and they are in court for a possession
order on Thursday. People urgently needed to sort out defences, and
to be there if eviction follows shortly after. Climbers have and are
being approached. New site number - 07005942212
On 12 December 2003 Stancliffe Stone, a subsidiary of Marshalls PLC
submitted a scheme for working the quarries at Endcliffe and Lees
Cross to the Peak District National Park Authority, PDNPA. They want
to extract 3.2 million tons of rock from a 12.95 hectare site within
100m of the Nine Ladies Stone Circle. The resultant scar will be 100m
deep, devastating the environment of this treasured site for ever.
Background info
The 4000 year old Iron Age Stone Circle, Nine Ladies, has over the
20th Century been threatened by quarrying. Lees Cross and Endcliffe
are old dormant quarries lying on the eastern moorside near the
stones.
1952: Stancliffe Obtains Lease of Mineral Rights to Endcliffe and
Lees Cross Quarries from landowner, the Duke of Rutland, Haddon Hall.
The Quarries are given planning consent because of the pressing need
for postwar building materials.
1995: Under the environment act Lees Cross and Endcliffe are declared
dormant (inactive). The operator is NOT allowed to work a dormant
quarry unless working practices have been agreed with the PDNPA.
Stancliffe is given time to disagree with this decision and does not
do so.
1999: Stancliffe make a submission to agree working practices and
reopen the quarries. The submission meets widespread opposition and
is cannot considered because the environmental impact assessment is
not adequate. Nine Ladies Anti-Quarry Campaign, a protest site
situated in the quarries themselves is set up.
2001: Stancliffe is bought out by the much larger Marshalls PLC
2003: Marshalls submit a new scheme for working, with the necessary
paperwork, to reopen the quarries and extract 3.2 million tons of
rock. If the PDNPA revokes the existing consent, they may be liable
compensation equal to the market value of the stone. There is no way
the authority can come up with this sum which could be more than £100
million.
Lees Cross and Endliffe are dormant quarries
Marshalls have hired a barrister to claim that the quarries should be
classed as active. Even though this is blatantly untrue, if this view
was upheld in law the PDNPA would be restricted in what working
conditions it could impose on the quarry.
As part of the Lease agreement, the landowner, Lord Edward Manners,
receives £30 for each ton of rock extracted. If the quarry goes ahead
Haddon Hall will make around £100 million.
This raises a serious question: As an example of British aristocracy,
should the Duke of Rutland, pocket £100m for sitting back and letting
the land around this ancient site be destroyed? Or as a Landowner,
should he bite the bullet and protect the land that he owns? We leave
you to make your own mind up
Write to : DEFRA Helpline
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
3-8 Whitehall Place
London
SW1A 2HH
Lord Edward Manners
Haddon Hall
Bakewell
Debys
De45 1La
Visit/Contact Nine Ladies anti-quarry campaign, Lees Road, Stanton
Lees, MATLOCK, Derbyshire, DE4 2LQ Tel: 0700 5942212
More information about the Diggers350
mailing list