Trespassers will be prosecuted
tony at cultureshop.org.uk
Tue Aug 2 14:58:01 BST 2011
Trespassers will be prosecuted
31 July 2011: Government plans to criminalise squatting will affect
rights to both housing and to protest says Liz Davies
Occupations like the one at UCL last year could become criminal
offences under the government's proposals.
The Ministry of Justice is consulting on proposals to criminalise
squatting with the intention of introducing amendments to the Legal
Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill in October.
In launching the consultation however, ministers were anything but
open-minded as to the outcome. Justice minister Crispin Blunt said:
'I am clear that the days of so-called squatters' rights must end and
squatters who break the law receive a proper punishment.' Meanwhile
housing minister Grant Shapps said he would tip 'the scales of
justice in favour of the law-abiding homeowner once and for all.'
The idea that squatters break into people's homes while they are out
at the shops is a right-wing media myth. It simply doesn't happen -
and one of the reasons why is because squatting someone's home is
already a criminal offence. Other reasons are that squatting
someone's home is anti-social and ineffective.
Shapps's 'law-abiding home-owner' is already well protected. What the
government is trying to do is to make it a criminal offence to squat
an empty, non-residential building. Even without the support of the
criminal law, owners of empty non-residential buildings are not
exactly at a disadvantage. They can obtain possession orders from the
courts very quickly and instruct bailiffs to remove squatters. When
squats keep going for weeks, months or even years, it's not because
the law is somehow 'pro-squatter'. It's because the owner hasn't
bothered to get a court order to remove them.
Criminalising squatting raises all sorts of problems. First, some
people squat who would otherwise be homeless and housed by local
authorities. Second, the police are notoriously reluctant to
intervene in what they see as housing disputes. Housing law is
notoriously complex and the standard police response is to say to all
concerned: 'Let the civil courts sort it out.' Third, it's impossible
to criminalise squatting - where people want a home - without also
criminalising other forms of trespass, such as occupations.
Should workers who non-violently occupy their workplace or students
who occupy academic buildings be criminalised? They are already
subject to civil law - the employer or academic institution can
obtain a possession order. Should the employer be entitled to send
the police in to remove a non-violent occupation? No doubt the Tories
think so, but do the rest of us?
What criminalising squatting will certainly do is act as a deterrent.
At the moment, all that squatters risk is that they may be evicted in
a few days' time. However, if the landowner can call the police and
have squatters immediately arrested and removed, far fewer people
will take that risk.
And that would be a shame because squatting empty buildings helps to
house people and maintain the building at the same time.
Criminalising trespass will also deter legitimate political protest,
such as occupations, peace camps or climate camp-type events.
The Ministry of Justice's consultation closes on 5 October. Responses
can be sent to: squatting.consultation at justice.gsi.gov.uk. There's an
extensive lobby group in favour of criminalising squatting, so the
opposite view needs to be voiced loud and clear.
+44 (0)7786 952037
"Capitalism is institutionalised bribery."
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which
alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
More information about the Diggers350