Review of planning appeals procedure in Wales
Paul Mobbs
mobbsey at gn.apc.org
Wed Aug 17 13:35:19 BST 2011
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
Another planning consultation, yet again launched during peak holiday time --
this time on planning appeals in Wales:
http://wales.gov.uk/consultations/planning/planningappeals/?lang=en
Start of consultation: 17/08/2011
End of consultation: 17/11/2011
Download from --
http://wales.gov.uk/docs/desh/consultation/111708planningappealsen.pdf
As with the planning reforms in England this is all done under the label of
"efficiency". Of course, as former US President Harry Truman said in a lecture
in 1959, "Whenever you have an efficient government you have a dictatorship."
Effectively that's what the planning system is becoming in order to persue any
form of development which might maintain the myth of perpetual growth.
The consultation paper contains mostly paper-shuffling reforms EXCEPT the two
seemingly mild changes they're trying to sneak under the radar.
*Firstly, types of appeal* -- this bring Wales into line with the new
procedures adopted in England in 2009.
If you appeal at the moment you have a choice between written representations,
an informal hearing or a public inquiry. What's proposed is to change this
system so that the option is based on the apparent *complexity* of the
planning case, not the public or political significance of the development
involved.
At present, where there's a lot of public concern, cases which might be heard
by an informal hearing can be sent for a full public inquiry -- especially
where the law on environmental, conservation landscape or archaeological
protection is in question. As is now the case in England, this restricts the
ability of the local council to demand a public inquiry so that other local
interested parties can put their case too.
We still have no third-party rights in the planning system -- this proposal
takes us in completely the wrong direction by introducing an arbirtrary
planning rules-based test for how an appeal should be heard, not the will of
the community who will be subject to the development.
*Secondly, and more significantly, costs*. it's proposed to extend costs to
written appeals. At the moment you can appeal by written representations and
not risk having costs awarded against you. It's proposed -- again to harmonise
Welsh practice with that in England -- to make it possible to award costs in
written appeals.
Let's say you're doing a low impact development and you have a dead-head local
council. Mostly those doing low impact development are already poor -- they
can't afford proper planning representation to make the initial application let
alone proper representation at an inquiry. If they have permission refused
they do at least have the chance of a written appeal to get the case heard by
a less partial judge than the local councillors.
Extending costs to written appeals, as in England, means they risk having the
local authority's costs awarded against them, with the implication that they
would have to pay a large bill for daring to appeal against the decision of
the council.
Ho hum...
P.
- --
.
"We are not for names, nor men, nor titles of Government,
nor are we for this party nor against the other but we are
for justice and mercy and truth and peace and true freedom,
that these may be exalted in our nation, and that goodness,
righteousness, meekness, temperance, peace and unity with
God, and with one another, that these things may abound."
(Edward Burrough, 1659 - from 'Quaker Faith and Practice')
Paul's book, "Energy Beyond Oil", is out now!
For details see http://www.fraw.org.uk/mei/ebo/
Read my 'essay' weblog, "Ecolonomics", at:
http://www.fraw.org.uk/mei/ecolonomics/
Paul Mobbs, Mobbs' Environmental Investigations
3 Grosvenor Road, Banbury OX16 5HN, England
tel./fax (+44/0)1295 261864
email - mobbsey at gn.apc.org
website - http://www.fraw.org.uk/mei/index.shtml
public key - http://www.fraw.org.uk/mei/mobbsey-2011.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)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=U8D6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Diggers350
mailing list