Undercover cops hack lives of law-abiding women activists
Tony Gosling
tony at cultureshop.org.uk
Wed Jan 30 01:36:21 GMT 2013
See also - Russia Today: 1.7m people homeless in UK (Bristol figure
is 19,500) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HL3v4oBYCTU
Britain's suffering its worst housing crisis in modern history - with
the number of new households increasing faster than the number of
homes it can build. Over 1.7 million families are waiting for a place to live.
Undercover cops hack lives of political women activists
http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=21741
At the crux of this case is the direct connection with MI5's Stasi
(yes, this is up against E. Germany's worst) tactics and the arrogant
expectation by the Met that these operations would never be discovered.
One can not help but wonder did Met police 'counter subversion'
activity stop here or were/are trades unions & political parties &
other perfectly legal & legitimate activities also targeted by Her
Majesty's crooked Detectives & Constables?
Probably the most important case in decades, subject to a crooked
judge already and obvious cheap, insulting delaying tactics.
Tony
If this story hasn't been irking you - it should have been
A load of Thunderballs: James Bond is fiction, not a police instruction manual
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/commentisfree+environment/mark-kennedy
A shocking ruling (let's call it the 007 standard) gives undercover
police licence to break hearts. It's the hacking of people's lives
Women who had relationships with police spies win partial legal victory
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2013/jan/17/women-relationships-police-spies-victory
Judge rules half of the women's cases can be heard in open court but
half must be first heard by secret tribunal
Rob Evans and Paul Lewis - guardian.co.uk, Thursday 17 January 2013 14.01 GMT
Ten women who say they were deceived into having sexual relationships
with undercover police officers have won only a partial victory in
their fight to have their case heard in the high court.
Mr Justice Tugendhat said the lawsuit alleged "the gravest
interference" with the fundamental rights of women who had long-term
relationships with police officers sent to spy on their political
groups. The judge rejected an attempt by the Metropolitan police to
have the whole case struck out of the court.
However, in a mixed ruling, the judge said that half the cases in the
legal action should first be heard by a secretive tribunal that
usually deals with complaints against MI5.
The case relates to a joint lawsuit brought by 10 women and one man
who claim they suffered emotional trauma after forming "deeply
personal" relationships with the police spies.
In his ruling, Tugendhat acknowledged that the allegations made by
the women were "very serious". He added that the case appeared to be
unprecedented. "No action against the police alleging sexual abuse of
the kind in question in these actions has been brought before the
courts in the past, so far as I have been made aware."
The judge drew a comparison with James Bond, the fictional member of
the intelligence service who "used relationships with women to obtain
information, or access to persons or property".
Although Ian Fleming, the writer of the Bond series, did not dwell on
"psychological harm he might have done to the women concerned", the
judge said fictional accounts such as these point to how
"intelligence and police services have for many years deployed both
men and women officers to form personal relationships of an intimate
sexual nature".
Lawyers for the Met had attempted to have all 11 cases struck out of
the court, arguing they constituted an abuse of process and should
instead by heard by the Investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPT), a
little-known complaints body.
However, they achieved only a partial victory.
In his ruling, the judge said that claims against two police officers
- Mark Kennedy and a second spy who posed as Mark Jacobs - should
first be heard by the IPT. Both of these officers were deployed after
2000, and some of the claims allege their activities constituted a
breach of the Human Rights Act, which came into force in October that year.
However, the judge said that other claims for damages under common
law, including torts of misfeasance in public office, deceit, assault
and negligence, should be heard by the high court.
He temporarily stayed high court proceedings pending the conclusion
of cases at the IPT. The special tribunal was introduced in 2000 to
examine complaints from the public about unjustified state
surveillance within what it calls "a necessary ring of secrecy".
Complainants do not see the evidence put forward by the state and
have no automatic right to an oral hearing. Neither can they appeal
its decision.
Lawyers for the some of the women described the decision to send half
of the cases to the tribunal as an "outrage".
Harriet Wistrich, of Birnberg Peirce, said: "We brought this case
because we want to see an end to sexual and psychological abuse of
campaigners for social justice and others by undercover police
officers. We are outraged that the high court has allowed the police
to use the IPT to preserve the secrecy of their abusive and
manipulative operations in order to prevent public scrutiny and challenge."
Another lawyer representing claimants in the case, Jules Carey,
pointed out the judge had accepted his clients may have been victims
of the "gravest" interference with their rights, adding: "Our clients
will have to carefully study the judgment and consider an appeal on
this issue."
The case is the first civil action to be brought before a court since
the Guardian revealed police officers were frequently sleeping with
political campaigners as part of a spy operation that has been
targeting protesters for four decades.
In total, six police officers stand accused in legal documents of
having sexual relationships with the women they were sent to spy on.
Some cases stretch as far back as the mid-1980s. One woman, who is
bringing a separate legal action, had a child with a police officer
she presumed was a fellow animal rights activists in the 1980s. He
later disappeared from her life and ceased all contact.
--
+44 (0)7786 952037
Twitter: @TonyGosling http://twitter.com/tonygosling
http://groups.google.com/group/uk-911-truth
http://www.youtube.com/user/PublicEnquiry
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Diggers350/
http://www.reinvestigate911.org/
http://www.thisweek.org.uk/
http://www.911forum.org.uk/
http://groups.google.com/group/uk-911-truth
uk-911-truth+subscribe at googlegroups.com
"Capitalism is institutionalised bribery."
_________________
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.globalresearch.ca
www.public-interest.co.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/series/Bristol+Broadband+Co-operative
www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.1407615751783.2051663.1274106225&l=90330c0ba5&type=1
<http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf>http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which
alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
<https://217.72.179.7/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/>https://217.72.179.7/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Fear not therefore: for there is nothing covered that shall not be
revealed; and nothing hid that shall not be made known. What I tell
you in darkness, that speak ye in the light and what ye hear in the
ear, that preach ye upon the housetops. Matthew 10:26-27
Die Pride and Envie; Flesh, take the poor's advice.
Covetousnesse be gon: Come, Truth and Love arise.
Patience take the Crown; throw Anger out of dores:
Cast out Hypocrisie and Lust, which follows whores:
Then England sit in rest; Thy sorrows will have end;
Thy Sons will live in peace, and each will be a friend.
http://tinyurl.com/6ct7zh6
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/private/diggers350/attachments/20130130/6b0c8e96/attachment.html>
More information about the Diggers350
mailing list