After Scotland's Indyref: Proposals for better democracy
mm at iniref.org
mm at iniref.org
Sat Dec 6 15:05:06 GMT 2014
iniref.org logo <http://www.iniref.org/>
The Scottish independence referendum during 2012 to 2014 attracted
huge interest across the world, from Canada to Spain, from China to
the USA. For the procedure, regulation, quality of public
information, enthusiasm and civility of debate, came high praise
from many commentators and countries. The referendum made a major
contribution to the reputation of democracy in its literal meaning,
rule by the people.
Two months after the September ballot, people are expressing
interest in finding ways to carry forward this gain in quality of
democracy. There are calls for further referenda and wider use of
direct democracy:
*Why not introduce direct democracy for a wider range of public
decisions in Scotland (Ed: maybe the UK would follow the example!)*
"if it is appropriate to use direst democracy to determine the
independence question why not use it for other major decisions which
Scots will make in the future?" Professor of constitutional law,
University of Edinburgh.
*Hold another Scottish referendum on proposals for further devolution?*
An expert on politics and public opinion has suggested that a second
Scottish referendum should be held on the new proposals for further
devolution, to be worked out by the Smith commission. "The timetable
forces the parties to come up with a proposal before the general
election; it does not lay out the process for after May 2015. It
would still be perfectly possible to have a public debate and a
referendum on the proposals and I think that is something the Smith
commission should be thinking very seriously about and actually
create time and space for this." Prof. John Curtice quoted in the
Sunday Times, 19 October 2014.
*Right to call a referendum could be given to Scotland*
Nicola Sturgeon called for powers over a future referendum to be
handed to the Scottish Parliament.
Scotland's incoming first minister has said the Scottish Parliament
should have the power to call any future independence referendum.
Holyrood gained temporary powers from Westminster for September's
vote, but Nicola Sturgeon said it should have explicit
responsibility to do so again.
However, she told the BBC she would still prefer to act by agreement
between Scottish and UK ministers.
*Nicola Sturgeon apparently calls for Scottish, Welsh and N. Irish
people's veto on EU "in or out" referendum*
"Incoming first minister says it would be 'democratically
indefensible' for Scotland to be taken out of EU against its will."
"Should a bill be tabled in the House of Commons for a referendum on
European Union membership, my party will table an amendment. That
amendment will require that for the UK to leave the EU, each of the
four constituent nations -- England, Scotland, Wales and Northern
Ireland -- would have to vote to do so, not just the UK as a whole."
Ed: This would be a federal-style process a bit like the Swiss
"Doppelmehr". Deciding to leave the EU would need not only a
majority of UK voters but also majorities in each country of the Union.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/private/diggers350/attachments/20141206/f53706f9/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/x-ygp-stripped
Size: 241 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/private/diggers350/attachments/20141206/f53706f9/attachment.bin>
More information about the Diggers350
mailing list