Moltex Energy's Stable Salt Reactor vs HPC / EDF China nuclear power
tony at cultureshop.org.uk
Tue Nov 15 07:38:00 GMT 2016
> Mon, 14 Nov 2016 12:33:34 -0800 (PST)
>From: Jasper Tomlinson <jaspertomlinson at gmail.com>
>Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 20:32:53 +0000
>Subject: Fwd: FW: [Diggers350] Bristol Channel
>tidal vs nuclear power cost calculations
>To: tony at cultureshop.org.uk
>Cc: Steve lancashire <stevelancs at btinternet.com>
>I might be able to contribute something useful
>here. I got Innovate UK funding for a
>feasibility study for a UK molten salt reactor.
>Our MSR Review Study (see
>) was released in July 2015. It included a
>recommendation that Moltex Energy's Stable Salt
>is the best option for UK Â development.
>Â Â I am not one of their team but very well informed about their activities.
>Â Â I am very ready to make a brief
>contribution in terms of their current business
>prospects and of the game-changing nature of
>innovations in fission reactor technology. I
>suppose I would need some sort of invitation from you?
>Jasper Tomlinson MA(Oxon) CEnv MCIWEM AMIMechE
>185 New Kent Road SE1 4AG
><tel:%2B44%20%280%29207%20357%209457>+44 (0)207 357 9457Â - 07785551068
>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>From: Steve lancashire
><<mailto:stevelancs at btinternet.com>stevelancs at btinternet.com>
>Date: 7 November 2016 at 18:05
>Subject: FW: [Diggers350] Bristol Channel tidal
>vs nuclear power cost calculations
>To: Jasper Tomlinson
><<mailto:jaspertomlinson at gmail.com>jaspertomlinson at gmail.com>
>Have you any inclination to join this debate and
>talk about the work you have been doing?
><mailto:stevelancs at btinternet.com>stevelancs at btinternet.com
>020 7703 1389
>From: Clive Menzies [mailto:clive at clivemenzies.co.uk]
>Sent: 07 November 2016 14:54
>To: Tony Gosling
>Subject: Re: [Diggers350] Bristol Channel tidal
>vs nuclear power cost calculations
>I ran your summary past a friend of mine who
>specialises in energy and finance. She responded:
>I think HPC is an expensive mistake...I have no
>confidence it can be delivered and given the
>delays there are better alternatives (5 years go
>it would have been a different story, except for the technical issue).
>On tidal...I think barrages across
>rivers/estuaries probably won't fly due to the
>environmental impact...these tend to be
>ecologically sensitive areas. Lagoons probably
>have more legs, particularly if they can be
>turned into leisure destinations as well eg the Swansea project.
>I wrote a bout tidal energy a while ago, here:
>On 07/11/16 01:08, Tony Gosling <mailto:tony at cultureshop.org.uk>
>>OKAY. Here's the figures -
>>Bristol Channel tidal vs nuclear power cost
>>calculations from last week's show with Paul Mobbs
>>- MeyGen Pentland new Scottish tidal power s
>>cheme: cost Â£1.6bn, 384MWe = 400 turbines at Â£4m (0.96MWe) each.
>>- Hinkley C EPR (PWR) nuclear reactor: cost
>>Â£37bn = 2560MWe. (insurance and dealing with
>>nuclear waste not included, paid for by taxpayers)
>>- Bristol Channel tidal power scheme,
>>approximate cost Â£10.7bn: 2560MWe = 2,667 turbines at Â£4m (0.96MWe) each
+44 (0)7786 952037
Twitter: @TonyGosling http://twitter.com/tonygosling
uk-911-truth+subscribe at googlegroups.com
"Capitalism is institutionalised bribery."
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic
poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
Fear not therefore: for there is nothing covered
that shall not be revealed; and nothing hid that
shall not be made known. What I tell you in
darkness, that speak ye in the light and what ye
hear in the ear, that preach ye upon the housetops. Matthew 10:26-27
Die Pride and Envie; Flesh, take the poor's advice.
Covetousnesse be gon: Come, Truth and Love arise.
Patience take the Crown; throw Anger out of dores:
Cast out Hypocrisie and Lust, which follows whores:
Then England sit in rest; Thy sorrows will have end;
Thy Sons will live in peace, and each will be a friend.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Diggers350