MIPIM UK & BNP Paribas: Property Speculators Are Carving Up Our Cities
Tony Gosling
tony at cultureshop.org.uk
Mon Nov 14 23:44:09 GMT 2016
MIPIM UK AND BNP PARIBAS: PROPERTY SPECULATORS ARE CARVING UP OUR CITIES
http://tlio.org.uk/mipim-uk-and-bnp-paribas-property-speculators-are-carving-up-our-cities/
<http://tlio.org.uk/mipim-uk-and-bnp-paribas-property-speculators-are-carving-up-our-cities/http://tlio.org.uk/mipim-uk-and-bnp-paribas-property-speculators-are-carving-up-our-cities/>14/11/2016
<http://tlio.org.uk/mipim-uk-and-bnp-paribas-property-speculators-are-carving-up-our-cities/http://tlio.org.uk/author/tony/>TONY
GOSLING
<http://tlio.org.uk/mipim-uk-and-bnp-paribas-property-speculators-are-carving-up-our-cities/http://tlio.org.uk/mipim-uk-and-bnp-paribas-property-speculators-are-carving-up-our-cities/#respond>LEAVE
A COMMENT
<http://tlio.org.uk/mipim-uk-and-bnp-paribas-property-speculators-are-carving-up-our-cities/https://cultureandpolitics.org/2016/10/23/property-speculators-are-carving-up-our-cities/>BY
DANIEL MARGRAIN 23RD OCTOBER 2016
<http://tlio.org.uk/mipim-uk-and-bnp-paribas-property-speculators-are-carving-up-our-cities/https://twitter.com/hairymarx1>FOLLOW
DANIEL ON TWITTER
In a
<http://tlio.org.uk/mipim-uk-and-bnp-paribas-property-speculators-are-carving-up-our-cities/https://cultureandpolitics.org/2016/01/11/housing-crisis-created-from-money-produced-from-thin-air/>previous
article, I outlined how the creation of a major
asset bubble as exemplified by the rising cost of
housing, is a deliberate government policy geared
towards satisfying the asset diversification
needs of the super rich rather than meeting the
human need for homes for ordinary people to live
in. In other words, the key motivating factor
determining the Conservative governments housing
policy, is not to end the housing crisis, but to
bolster the investment opportunities of the rich which will make it worse.
To this end, the government under former PM David
Cameron, almost nine months ago,
<http://tlio.org.uk/mipim-uk-and-bnp-paribas-property-speculators-are-carving-up-our-cities/http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-35274783?ocid=socialflow_twitter&ns_mchannel=social&ns_campaign=bbcnews&ns_source=twitter>announced
its decision to demolish what remains of council
homes and replace them with private housing. The
<http://tlio.org.uk/mipim-uk-and-bnp-paribas-property-speculators-are-carving-up-our-cities/http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2015-16/housingandplanning.html>Housing
and Planning Bill, which became law in May, is
forcing families living in social housing and
earning £30,000-£40,000 in London to pay rents
nearly as high as those in the private sector. It
is also compelling local authorities to sell
high value housing, either by transferring
public housing into private hands or giving the
land it sits on to property developers. It is
this combination of factors that explains the
exponential growth in the construction of new
tower blocks throughout London and other major cities.
Mipim UK Property Speculators Convention
A Tory housing policy focused on encouraging safe
conditions for foreign investment funds and
financial safe havens for billionaires, was the
context for the
<http://tlio.org.uk/mipim-uk-and-bnp-paribas-property-speculators-are-carving-up-our-cities/http://www.mipimuk.co.uk/discover/>Mipim
UK Property Speculators Convention at Kensington
Olympia in west London (19-21 October). Sir
Edward Lister, chair of the governments Homes
and Communities Agency,
<http://tlio.org.uk/mipim-uk-and-bnp-paribas-property-speculators-are-carving-up-our-cities/https://socialistworker.co.uk/art/43570/Wed+take+money+off+the+devil%E2%80%94meet+the+property+speculators+carving+up+your+city>explained
Were involved in bringing parties together,
marketing areas to attract the right kind of
people to them
We brand local authorities,
industries and areas to make them attractive to investors.
One of the things that attracts people to the UK
is the relative
stability,<http://tlio.org.uk/mipim-uk-and-bnp-paribas-property-speculators-are-carving-up-our-cities/https://socialistworker.co.uk/art/43570/Wed+take+money+off+the+devil%E2%80%94meet+the+property+speculators+carving+up+your+city>said
John Slade, CEO of BNP Paribas Real Estate in the
UK. But popularity is more important to
politicians than the future of our businesses.
The government remains absolutely committed to
ensure that the UK remains one of the most open
places for investment,
<http://tlio.org.uk/mipim-uk-and-bnp-paribas-property-speculators-are-carving-up-our-cities/https://socialistworker.co.uk/art/43570/Wed+take+money+off+the+devil%E2%80%94meet+the+property+speculators+carving+up+your+city>he
said. But investment opportunities are undermined
following any attempts by the government to increase supply.
Increasing supply would not only have a
detrimental impact as far as large investors are
concerned, but will also adversely affect the
property investment portfolios of politicians.
The 126 MPs who
<http://tlio.org.uk/mipim-uk-and-bnp-paribas-property-speculators-are-carving-up-our-cities/http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm/cmregmem/150330/part1contents.htm>declared
that they receive rental income from property,
<http://tlio.org.uk/mipim-uk-and-bnp-paribas-property-speculators-are-carving-up-our-cities/http://landlord-mps.co.uk/>represent
over 19 per cent of the house, the vast majority
of whom are Conservatives. Its in the joint
interests of MPs and major property developers
who lobby on their behalf to continue to push the
market further into housing and to loosen planning controls.
Social cleansing & privatisation of space
The impact of the lack of availability of
affordable housing (combined with the bedroom
tax) is twofold: It results in the effective
social cleansing from major cities of the poor
and those on middle incomes, and alters former
public spaces into sanitised privatised ones.
This process not only reduces the demographic mix
of locales, but it also undermines social
networks and local economies upon which local
businesses depend for their livelihoods.
More broadly, the hollowing out of large parts of
cities changes our perceptions of what
constitutes private and public spaces and for
what use the state intends to put them to. The
February 13 edition of the Guardian
<http://tlio.org.uk/mipim-uk-and-bnp-paribas-property-speculators-are-carving-up-our-cities/http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/feb/13/will-self-mass-trespass-london-protest>reported
on a London rally that protested against the
corporate takeover of public streets and squares.
Protesters cited Londons Canary Wharf, Olympic
Park and the Broadgate development in the City as
public places now governed by the rules of the corporations that own them.
The main issues that underpinned the London
protests relate to how economic conditions are
re-redefining many urban spaces as cultural
centres of production. This is leading not to
diversification but rather to a uniformity in
which the high street, airport, shopping mall,
museum and art gallery are increasingly speaking
corporate culture rather than aesthetic pleasure.
Privatised public zones are appearing throughout
Britain. They include Birminghams Brindley
place, a significant canal-side development, and
Princesshay in Exeter,
<http://tlio.org.uk/mipim-uk-and-bnp-paribas-property-speculators-are-carving-up-our-cities/https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/feb/13/will-self-mass-trespass-london-protest>described
as a shopping destination featuring over 60
shops set in a series of interconnecting open
streets and squares. Intrinsic to the
privatisation agenda is the
<http://tlio.org.uk/mipim-uk-and-bnp-paribas-property-speculators-are-carving-up-our-cities/https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2015/sep/08/pspos-new-control-orders-public-spaces-asbos-freedoms>Public
Space Protection Order (PSPO). Introduced by the
coalition government, the PSPO is another form of
social cleansing that is intended to criminalise
those sleeping rough and to drive them from towns and city centres.
In other words, the formal ordering and
disciplining of the poorest within urban spaces
has had the affect of pushing them to the
periphery, out of sight and out of mind of urban
powers for whom responsibility is increasingly
disavowed. In this way, spaces are shaped by
<http://tlio.org.uk/mipim-uk-and-bnp-paribas-property-speculators-are-carving-up-our-cities/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoliberalism>neoliberal
economic forces which alter the landscapes of
cities and re-package them under the banner urban renaissance.
Landscapes of power
Begun under New Labour, the ideology that
underpins urban renaissance reflects a historical
contradiction between planning in terms of social
need and the process of competitive accumulation
which is expressed in living and working urban
spaces. This contradiction can be traced back to
the
<http://tlio.org.uk/mipim-uk-and-bnp-paribas-property-speculators-are-carving-up-our-cities/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Town_and_Country_Planning_Act_1947>1947
Town and Planning Act. Although urban planners
have often been cast in an heroic role protecting
the public from shoddy contractors and the
short-term drive for profit by speculators, town
planning has been skewed historically by deeply undemocratic practices.
Under Theresa Mays government these undemocratic
practices are manifested in the kind of
supply-side strategies for urban investment
outlined above. Examples are regeneration
programmes predicated on place promotion and
development with culture, heritage and
conspicuous consumption in mind. This vision, in
other words, is paradoxically linked to the
<http://tlio.org.uk/mipim-uk-and-bnp-paribas-property-speculators-are-carving-up-our-cities/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idea_of_Progress>ideology
of progress as seen through the visual lens of economic power.
The expression of this power can be seen in terms
of the redevelopment of waterside areas such as
Londons Docklands. Although a regenerated or
cleaned up Docklands maintains some of the
visual references of its past, it nevertheless is
a space that has lost almost all the social and
political symbolism it once carried. It is a view
of the past that has lost all power to express what that past meant.
In effect, developers in these circumstances
remove all unsuitable symbols of the past
within the urban landscape and replace them with
superficial inauthentic post-industrial elements.
They succeed in this Truman Show
<http://tlio.org.uk/mipim-uk-and-bnp-paribas-property-speculators-are-carving-up-our-cities/https://cultureandpolitics.org/2016/10/13/truman-the-corporate-branded-vision-of-space/>totalitarian
image-making by projecting the collective desires
of the powerless into a corporate landscape of power.
Back at the convention
Meanwhile, back at the speculators convention at
Olympia, Sir Edward Lister, chair of the
governments Homes and Communities Agency, who
also happens to consult for real estate giant
CBRE,
<http://tlio.org.uk/mipim-uk-and-bnp-paribas-property-speculators-are-carving-up-our-cities/https://socialistworker.co.uk/art/43570/Wed+take+money+off+the+devil%E2%80%94meet+the+property+speculators+carving+up+your+city>claimed
that last year was the best year for house
building on record, yet last year
<http://tlio.org.uk/mipim-uk-and-bnp-paribas-property-speculators-are-carving-up-our-cities/http://www.nhbc.co.uk/cms/publish/consumer/NewsandComment/Stats/2015_Annual_Stats.pdf>under
40,000 new build registrations in the public and
affordable sector were made. In the immediate
post-war years (1945 to 1951) some 1.2 million
new houses
<http://tlio.org.uk/mipim-uk-and-bnp-paribas-property-speculators-are-carving-up-our-cities/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/property/new-homes/3318114/The-century-makers-1945.html>were
built. In 1968 a record 425,000 homes
<http://tlio.org.uk/mipim-uk-and-bnp-paribas-property-speculators-are-carving-up-our-cities/http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-26271803>were
built, over 180,000 of which were local authority homes.
Mass council house building is the most effective
way to house people but this undermines the
profits of private firms. One way they do this is
by holding onto land rather than developing it,
so that prices are pushed upwards. As prices
within the private rental market soar, more firms
are trying to get their hands on the profits
generated. According to 2015
<http://tlio.org.uk/mipim-uk-and-bnp-paribas-property-speculators-are-carving-up-our-cities/http://www.paragon-group.co.uk/file_source/Files/MAIN/pdf/PRS%20Reports/PRS%20Report%202015.pdf%20>research
from Paragon PLC, the private rented sector (PRS)
is the second largest housing tenure, accounting
for one-in-five homes in England alone,
overtaking the social rented sector for the first
time since the 1960s. This represents a
significant increase in the number of households
living in private rented homes. The report
<http://tlio.org.uk/mipim-uk-and-bnp-paribas-property-speculators-are-carving-up-our-cities/http://www.paragon-group.co.uk/file_source/Files/MAIN/pdf/PRS%20Reports/PRS%20Report%202015.pdf%20>added,
the PRS has more than doubled since 2001 and is
now the second largest housing tenure
PRS is now
home to 4.9 million households.
Private good, public bad
The increase in private rented dwellings is
largely the result of the fact that council
housing has been gutted and the majority of
people cant afford to buy their own homes. But
investors think that the change in numbers is
down to the market reflecting what people want.
Tory policy for housing focuses on getting people
to buy houses. But this ideological drive is out
of sync with the needs of capital. Investors need
a political climate in which renting is
encouraged. However, the Tories are ideologically
tied to a house buying culture. This isnt the
case in countries such as Holland or Germany
where government investment in social housing for rent is the norm.
According to the Department for Communities and
Local Government
<http://tlio.org.uk/mipim-uk-and-bnp-paribas-property-speculators-are-carving-up-our-cities/https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/536589/56046_DCLG_ARA_Print_Ready.pdf>annual
report into social housing selloffs, of the
21,992 dwellings sold over the past year in the
UK, 12,557 were sold by local authorities and
9,435 by housing associations. The local
authorities figure is a 1 per cent increase on
last year. The housing association figure
represents an 18 per cent rise. Government funds
for housing associations are drying up. In order
to make money these associations are effectively
forced to sell their properties to the private
sector. The profits gained are then reinvested
into their businesses reducing the overall
availability of affordable housing stock.
Essentially, housing associations behave like
private companies. This process is being
accelerated as a result of the
<http://tlio.org.uk/mipim-uk-and-bnp-paribas-property-speculators-are-carving-up-our-cities/http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2016/22/contents/enacted>Housing
and Planning Act which forces local authorities
to sell off council housing. The proceeds are
then used to encourage housing associations to
extend
<http://tlio.org.uk/mipim-uk-and-bnp-paribas-property-speculators-are-carving-up-our-cities/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_Buy>Right
to Buy which will reduce the amount of affordable
housing stock even further. As long as the Tories
remain in power, the likelihood local communities
will remain stable and socioeconomically diverse
in the not too distant future is remote.
<http://tlio.org.uk/mipim-uk-and-bnp-paribas-property-speculators-are-carving-up-our-cities/https://www.cultureandpolitics.org/>https://www.cultureandpolitics.org/
So much emphasis is placed on select Jewish
participation in Bormann companies that when
Adolf Eichmann was seized and taken to Tel Aviv
to stand trial, it produced a shock wave in the
Jewish and German communities of Buenos Aires.
Jewish leaders informed the Israeli authorities
in no uncertain terms that this must never happen
again because a repetition would permanently
rupture relations with the Germans of Latin
America, as well as with the Bormann
organization, and cut off the flow of Jewish
money to Israel. It never happened again, and the
pursuit of Bormann quieted down at the request of
these Jewish leaders. He is residing in an
Argentinian safe haven, protected by the most
efficient German infrastructure in history as
well as by all those whose prosperity depends on his well-being.
<http://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fspitfirelist.com%2Fbooks%2Fmartin-bormann-nazi-in-exile%2F&h=eAQErj17O>http://spitfirelist.com/books/martin-bormann-nazi-in-exile/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/private/diggers350/attachments/20161114/b7ae4880/attachment.html>
More information about the Diggers350
mailing list