[Diggers350] Fwd: Re: The National Trust is trying to eliminate livestock farming by pushing tenants out for 'pantheist' rewilding projects
C COTTON
chriscotton13558 at btinternet.com
Sun Aug 14 16:23:09 BST 2022
Hi Folks
Have been asked to pass this on if I like, so I like.
Happy days
Chris
------ Original Message ------
From: "Tony Gosling" <tony at cultureshop.org.uk>
To: "C COTTON" <chriscotton13558 at btinternet.com>
Sent: Saturday, 13 Aug, 22 At 23:14
Subject: Re: [Diggers350] The National Trust is trying to eliminate
livestock farming by pushing tenants out for 'pantheist' rewilding
projects
hi chris
please send this reply to the list if you like - email address is
diggers350 at gn.apc.org.
Rgds
TG
At 20:02 07/08/2022, you wrote:
Hi , you have to wonder what makes the NT tick sometimes, during the
covid periods the NT lost , it is estimated , £240 million quid, and
other people have stopped donating to the NT because of the direction
they are going in, the obvious thing would for them to keep farmers of
any kind so as to get income, yet, they turf people off to rewild or
other sceme, and , have to pay someone to look after it all, where is
the sence or reason in that, must be an NT thing,when you concider that
employees and managers are classroom taught with computers, which means
that if its on computer it must be right, despite what all the old
farmer giles type people have been doing for 100s of years in looking
after the land and the wildlife. There is also the shooting estates left
to the Trust, but instead of having shoots with a game keeper , earning
thousands, who look after the wildlife, they ban all shooting, again
employ someone to alllegedly look the land, and end up with no small
birds or animals, as the predetors have taken over.
In the blogs below , the NT are turfing all sorts of folk off lands
for their own use/needs, yet they say they value their tenants, there
must be government type people in the NT, as they say one thing, do
something else, but mean something entirely different, and yet amongst
all this, the NT are spending £6 million on reroofing ,and other bits at
Oxborough Hall near Swaffham.
It make you wonder what the founders of the NT would be saying if they
could see and hear what is going on, i would think mini tremors where
they are buried as they turn in their graves in disgust.
OOOhhh happy days
Regards
Chris
------ Original Message ------
From: "Tony Gosling" <tony at cultureshop.org.uk>
To: diggers350 at gn.apc.org; TheLandIsOurs at yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, 2 Aug, 22 At 01:50
Subject: [Diggers350] The National Trust is trying to eliminate
livestock farming by pushing tenants out for 'pantheist' rewilding
projects
The National Trust is trying to eliminate livestock farming by
pushing tenants out for 'pantheist' rewilding projects
https://tlio.org.uk/the-national-trust-is-trying-to-eliminate-livestock-farming-by-pushing-tenants-out-for-rewilding-projects/
<https://www.fwi.co.uk/business/business-management/tenancies-rents/national-trust-rewilding-projects-leaves-tenants-feel-pushed-out>
https://www.fwi.co.uk/business/business-management/tenancies-rents/national-trust-rewilding-projects-leaves-tenants-feel-pushed-out
<https://www.fwi.co.uk/business/business-management/tenancies-rents/national-trust-rewilding-projects-leaves-tenants-feel-pushed-out>
Several farming tenants and the Tenant Farmers Association (TFA) are
concerned by what they see as the over-zealous way in which the National
Trust is taking productive agricultural land back in-hand for rewilding.
Farmers Weekly talks to some tenants who have lost the land they have
farmed for years.
See also: Why farm tenants are criticising National Trust landlords
<https://www.fwi.co.uk/business/business-management/tenancies-rents/why-farm-tenants-are-criticising-national-trust-landlords>
Devon farmer leaves after 28 years
Patrick Greed, who farms on the Killerton Estate in Devon, feels he
has “betrayed agriculture� after accepting an incentive from the
National Trust to give up his Agricultural Holdings Act (AHA) tenancy
after 28 years.
As well as the main 160ha holding he farmed, he had another 60ha of
river meadow grazing on a Farm Business Tenancy (FBT).
“The National Trust kept renewing it every five or 10 years,
depending upon what environmental stewardship schemes we were in,� he
says.
“Most recently, we had been in Higher Level Stewardship and once
that ended, they decided to take it back for tree planting, scrapes and
rewilding.�
Loss of this land meant 61-year-old Mr Greed had to reduce his
Limousin suckler herd. “We had 550 head (cows and followers) before we
lost the river meadows. Now we have 340.�
Mr Greed’s pedigree limousin © Patrick Greed
With it becoming increasingly difficult to farm the land
productively, alongside TB risks and greater public use of the land, Mr
Greed accepted the incentive to quit and will leave the farm next year.
But he is uneasy about the direction the National Trust is taking.
“It is not reletting it as a farm. It plans to do a lot of tree
planting on the main holding. But just over 120ha of it is Grade 1 and 2
arable land.
“It [the National Trust] even wants to plant trees on some of the
permanent pasture. It is wrong. Farmers ought to be producing as much
food as possible from this land.�
Mr Greed is not alone. Land agent Kevin Bateman, director of Bateman
Hosegood, has come across numerous cases, particularly in the past two
years, where the National Trust has taken back tenanted land for
rewilding and tree planting.
“It feels like re-enactment of the Highland clearances – a land
grabb,� he says.
Typically, tenants are finding that their FBTs, which have been
historically renewed, are being taken back in-hand, which is
significantly affecting the viability of some businesses.
“And some tenants with AHA tenancies are being offered cash
incentives to give them up too, says Mr Bateman.
“The policy feels like it is financially driven, with the trust
targeting big grants for landscape-scale nature recovery at the expense
of its tenanted farms.
It sees this as a way of creating significant income for itself.
However, it does not understand the implications for the farming
businesses and family homes that it is effectively destroying,� he
explains.
“The way it is doing this suggests that it has complete contempt
for the farmers who have farmed the land for generations.�
Cornwall farmer feels ‘destroyed’
When Tom Hasson, 42, and his partner Becki Prouse, 37, took on the
220ha mixed farm FBT in Stowe Barton, Cornwall seven years ago – having
farmed 60-80ha of it for 14 years – they fully expected to continue.
Tom Hasson and family © Tom Hasson
“When we took it on, the National Trust said it wanted to let it to
a young farming family like us. In June last year, we went with a
proposal to renew our Mid-Tier stewardship and tenancy,� says Mr
Hasson.
“So it came as a bombshell when the trust said it had different
plans for the premises. It wanted to take all the land back and create a
nature reserve with agricultural production as a ‘by-product’ rather
than the main aim.�
At their last meeting, the National Trust suggested running 50 head
of cattle over 220ha on a year-to-year grazing licence.
“But there would be no security and how could we get an income when
they would be taking the payments? Our plans are up in the air,� says
Mr Hasson.
“It has totally destroyed us and upset the kids.� Ms Prouse
agrees: “There is no recognition of what we have done. I feel
empty.�
Devon farm goes to public access
Echoing this sentiment is Tim Jankins, who came out of his 180ha
mixed farm FBT on the South Devon Estate, near Plymouth, in November
last year.
Tim Jakins © Moostones
“We were there for 25 years. The National Trust approached us in
2018 when our tenancy was up for renewal and said we couldn’t renew it
on the previous terms,� he says.
“It wanted a large amount of public access, and to rewild some of
it.
“My gut reaction told me to get out. I’d put a lifetime’s
savings into it and I didn’t want to be there when it reverted back to
whatever it was supposed to be reverting back to.�
He has since heard that the farmhouse is empty and that there are
many weeds on the farm. “It is good, productive land,� he adds.
“We used to supply a good amount of beef and lamb, with grain going
to local feed mills. This now has to be brought in from further away,
which doesn’t help the carbon footprint.�
TFA: ‘Wrong-headed’ policy
Tenant Farmers Association (TFA) chief executive George Dunn says
that what is happening to some tenants is devastating.
“They have put their heart and soul into a place, hoping to get
some sort of tenancy renewal and are told this is not going to happen.
“People are bringing up families on these farms, they are involved
in local communities and go to local schools.�
While he is aware of conversations on other National Trust estates,
Mr Dunn says the situation is most potent in the South West,
particularly affecting coastal properties.
“The Trust is focusing attention on what it considers is needed for
biodiversity net gain and carbon reduction. It doesn’t see these farms
as particularly important from an agricultural perspective.�
The TFA thinks the policy is entirely wrong-headed. “It is a vanity
project driven by the current media frenzy around rewilding, which in
our view is not based on sound science,� says Mr Dunn.
The TFA is also challenging Defra over spending public money on such
projects.
“The government’s objective is to maintain the landlord/tenant
system in agriculture.
“If a landlord like the National Trust decides to bring someone’s
occupation of a farm to an end, it shouldn’t have access to public
funding for planting trees and rewilding,� Mr Dunn suggests.
He advises tenants who have been approached about giving up their
tenancy not to go quietly and to speak up for what they believe to be
right.
“Contact the TFA,� he adds. “We are building a database to help
lobby the National Trust on a joint basis – the more ccases we have, the
better.�
National Trust insists it values its tenants
The National Trust says it wants to make its land “better for
nature�, to help tackle the nature and climate crisis.
“We want to create and restore 25,000ha for nature on our land by
2025 – work started in 2017. This means we may reetain land in-hand,
often temporarily, to reset the management model,� says a spokesman.
Any payments made as incentives to surrender tenancies are from
National Trust funds, and each case is considered in its local context.
The trust denies taking land back so it can claim future Landscape
Recovery or other environmental grants.
“If we hold land in-hand, it is with a view to taking some time to
plan its future use and management,� the spokesman explains.
“When we decide to make changes to our land, we look at the
different options available to support any capital investments needed
and to secure appropriate long-term management.
“We anticipate future funding will come from a variety of sources
and that rental income will continue to be part of that mix.�
The National Trust says it is acutely aware of the impact on tenants
when tenancies are not renewed. “We work hard to support our tenants
with the challenges they face as a result of this,� it insists.
NB please reply with any unsubscribe request in the email body,
leaving the subject line intact, if you do not wish to recieve further
emails - thanks
And it came to pass, as he sat at meat with them, he took bread, and
blessed it, and brake, and gave to them. 31
<http://biblehub.com/luke/24-31.htm> And their eyes were opened, and
they knew him; and he vanished out of their sight.
http://biblehub.com/kjv/luke/24.htm
<http://biblehub.com/kjv/luke/24.htm>
'Capitalism is institutionalised bribery' TG
https://www.youtube.com/user/PublicEnquiry/videos
<https://www.youtube.com/user/PublicEnquiry/videos> "And I think, in
the end, that is the best definition of journalism I have heard; to
challenge authority - all authority - especially so when governments and
politicians take us to war, when they have decided that they will kill
and others will die. "
--Robert Fisk
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMn9GM4atN3t7AHJBbHMR0Q/videos
<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMn9GM4atN3t7AHJBbHMR0Q/videos>
http://www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
<http://www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149>
http://www.thisweek.org.uk
<http://www.thisweek.org.uk/> http://www.911forum.org.uk
<http://www.911forum.org.uk/> http://www.tlio.org.uk
<http://www.tlio.org.uk/> Download, donation only, Tony's three
watermarked books http://www.bilderberg.org
<http://www.bilderberg.org/> - My books https://payhip.com/TonyGosling
<https://payhip.com/TonyGosling>
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCvPbHiqhLtpNWA_cg_1NULw
<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCvPbHiqhLtpNWA_cg_1NULw>
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMn9GM4atN3t7AHJBbHMR0Q
<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMn9GM4atN3t7AHJBbHMR0Q>
https://www.twitter.com/TonyGosling
<https://www.twitter.com/TonyGosling>
https://www.facebook.com/tony.gosling.16
<https://www.facebook.com/tony.gosling.16> You can donate to support
Tony's work here http://www.bilderberg.org/bcfm.htm
<http://www.bilderberg.org/bcfm.htm> Or buy Tony's three ebooks for
£10-£15 here https://payhip.com/TonyGosling
<https://payhip.com/TonyGosling> or paperback here
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/254963338161
<https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/254963338161> TG mobile +44 7786 952037
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.gn.apc.org/pipermail/diggers350/attachments/20220814/bdd9e6cc/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 68f47c96.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 364582 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.gn.apc.org/pipermail/diggers350/attachments/20220814/bdd9e6cc/attachment-0002.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 68f47cb5.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 142525 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.gn.apc.org/pipermail/diggers350/attachments/20220814/bdd9e6cc/attachment-0003.jpg>
More information about the Diggers350
mailing list