[Lac] RV: [Bureau] Re: CSB members fellowship + CTWG fellowship slots as well?

[Beatriz Busaniche]

-----Mensaje original-----
De: bureau-request at geneva2003.org [mailto:bureau-request at geneva2003.org] En
nombre de claire.chombeau at ties.itu.ch
Enviado el: miércoles, 15 de octubre de 2003 8:54
Para: bureau at geneva2003.org
Asunto: RE: [Bureau] Re: CSB members fellowship + CTWG fellowship slots as
well?


Dear all,

As asked by our donors, we may only support participants /CSB members from
LDCs or from developing and in transition countries (lists already sent). 

Best Regards,

Claire

Quoting Beatriz Busaniche <busaniche at caminandoutopias.org.ar>:

> Dear all
> 
> I want to ask for clarification for CSB members that come from 
> "developed countries" like Mexico and Argentina.  Following the 
> fellowships criteria, Latin America and Caribe, and education and 
> academia focal points would not have support to be at wsis because 
> Argentina and Mexico are not in the list provided by the CSD?  I am 
> still asking about this situation, and still receiving no concrete and 
> satisfactory answer.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Lic. Beatriz Busaniche
> busaniche at caminandoutopias.org.ar
> Centro de Teletrabajo y Teleformación
> Carrera de Relaciones del Trabajo
> Universidad de Buenos Aires
> www.caminandoutopias.org.ar
> 
> 
> 
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: bureau-admin at wsis-cs.org [mailto:bureau-admin at wsis-cs.org] En 
> nombre de Alan G. Alegre Enviado el: miércoles, 15 de octubre de 2003 
> 6:20
> Para: viola at icvolunteers.org; bureau at geneva2003.org; 
> claire.chombeau at ties.itu.ch; bureau at wsis-cs.org
> Asunto: [Bureau] Re: CSB members fellowship + CTWG fellowship slots as 
> well?
> 
> 
> Hi all
> 
> Just a comment and suggestion. (I don't know if this was raised as 
> Angela was the Asia Pacific Family rep on the bureau during the second 
> week when this issue was discussed , as I sat in our country 
> delegation)..
> 
> If CSB members--from LDCs and transition/developing country 
> participants especially--have slots in the fellowship pool, I will not 
> have a problem with that. Either Angela or I will apply for that slot.
> 
> My comment is this: as with the CSB, key people within the Content & 
> Themes Working Group (CTWG) should also I think be "reserved" slots in 
> the fellowship pool, subject to the same restrictions/requirements of 
> donors, don't you think? As important as we think our work at the CSB 
> is :-). I think we should also acknowledge that some people from the 
> South who are not bureau members and who need funding support are just 
> as important (if not
> moreso) in furthering Civil Society's agenda during the summit and 
> PrepComs.
> 
> It will also seem less self-serving for CSB members (who is after all 
> involved in the Fellowship Process) if we can also ensure a minimum 
> number of slots to qualified C&TWG core members. We are supposed to be 
> "facilitative" of general civil society participation, aren't we? And 
> the Content & Themes Working group is at the center of many of our 
> interventions in PrepCom2, 3, and in the coming PrepCom3A and the 
> Summit itself.
> 
> My proposal is a certain percentage of slots be also reserved for 
> CTWG, if there will a similar allocation (and prioritization) for CSB 
> members. We could even ask Sally (who now also sits in the Bureau 
> meetings) to now think of a few names who CTWG feels *must* be 
> present. Of course they would also have to be within the general 
> criteria. But a point is, they themselves should decide who is most 
> strategic to be granted a fellowship from the CTWG, not us really.
> 
> Will this be a problem for any of us?
> 
> Cheers
> Al
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Viola Krebs <viola at icvolunteers.org>
> To: <bureau at geneva2003.org>; <claire.chombeau at ties.itu.int>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 10:34 AM
> Subject: Re: CSB members fellowship
> 
> 
> 
> Hello everybody,
> 
> I support Olivier's position. I think this was clearly agreed upon in 
> Geneva. It only creates problems to put CS Bureau members in the same 
> pot as everybody else. They really need to be listed separately.
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Viola
> 
> ---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
> From: Olivier Nana Nzépa <anais_ac at yahoo.fr>
> Reply-To: bureau at geneva2003.org
> Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 23:10:45 +0200 (CEST)
> 
> >As far as fellowships are concerned, I think it is't fair to not put
> >the
> CSB members on the same list with the others candidates. That was one 
> of the agreement reached in Geneva.
> >Best
> >
> >claire.chombeau at ties.itu.int wrote:
> >Dear Amir,
> >
> >There is no special fund for the CSB members. You will have to think 
> >to
> include
> >yourself in the selection you will send me (deadlines still to be
> confirmed,
> >pre-selection by the families 1st of November and final selection by
> >the regional group 7th of November?)
> >
> >Best regards,
> >
> >Claire
> >
> >Quoting Barmaki Amir Hossein :
> >
> >> Dear Angela
> >>
> >> Just as a matter of reminding to myslef, do CSB members need to 
> >> fill
> >> up
> the
> >>
> >> fellowship forms or there is another process for them?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> Amir
> >> West Asia Family
> >>
> >> _________________________________________________________________
> >> Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online
> >> http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >---------------------------------
> >Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français !
> >Testez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bureau mailing list
> Bureau at wsis-cs.org 
> http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/bureau
> 
> 
> 
>